RobS
Super Member
<font color="blue"> Make the tractor with a variable position gravity center </font>
Both modern and vintage ag tractors have this feature, it just doesn't adjust automatically. Weights of all sorts are added/deleted from tractors depending on the conditions.
Regarding strength of frames etc... I'm not an ag engineer so I can only make this assumption: Weight of components is not a significant consideration in tractor design, at least nowhere near as significant as in the auto industry. Based on that assumption, if the ag designer needs a stronger frame member he/she is unlikely to pursue an expensive, higher strength material when it is much cheaper/easier to just add material. Thicker sections etc. are an excellent, though low tech, solution where applicable.
Now what if that engineer had used a 3D CAD system with self-contained FEA modelling for stress and fatigue simulation to design the part. Now he/she makes several design iterations before spending a penny on a prototype part. Once ready for a prototype, the CAD data file is sent electronically to the machine shop where it is further manipulated to generate tool paths etc. then fed directly into the CNC machining center. Minutes later, out pops a part, ready for test. Not quite ready for a test part but want a mock up? Send the same CAD data to a 3D printer and have a plastic model made a few minutes as well.
I don't know for sure, but I'll bet this technology is used in the ag industry every day. It is commonplace in the auto industry /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Both modern and vintage ag tractors have this feature, it just doesn't adjust automatically. Weights of all sorts are added/deleted from tractors depending on the conditions.
Regarding strength of frames etc... I'm not an ag engineer so I can only make this assumption: Weight of components is not a significant consideration in tractor design, at least nowhere near as significant as in the auto industry. Based on that assumption, if the ag designer needs a stronger frame member he/she is unlikely to pursue an expensive, higher strength material when it is much cheaper/easier to just add material. Thicker sections etc. are an excellent, though low tech, solution where applicable.
Now what if that engineer had used a 3D CAD system with self-contained FEA modelling for stress and fatigue simulation to design the part. Now he/she makes several design iterations before spending a penny on a prototype part. Once ready for a prototype, the CAD data file is sent electronically to the machine shop where it is further manipulated to generate tool paths etc. then fed directly into the CNC machining center. Minutes later, out pops a part, ready for test. Not quite ready for a test part but want a mock up? Send the same CAD data to a 3D printer and have a plastic model made a few minutes as well.
I don't know for sure, but I'll bet this technology is used in the ag industry every day. It is commonplace in the auto industry /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif