Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change

   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #31  
Thanks Brian. I did talk to my dealer recently. They have a telescoping lift arm set including stabilizers which I think are pin adjustable. I hopefully will get more info on it tomorrow. I will also ask if they have anything with the Euro style ends. Asking regarding other makes just to see if a wider choice range is possible.

Am I correct in understanding that you sell the Euro ends that could be welded onto the lift arms though they would not be extendable?

Yes this is for the DK5010. Only one we have.

Richard

Yes, I can provide you with the weld on Euro QH hook ends and balls as needed. $250 gets you 2 ends and 4 balls shipped USPS flat rate box.

It is an option for you to consider. ;)
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change
  • Thread Starter
#32  
^^ +1

I have Pat's on my non-telescoping Mahindra 3PH and they work well with the optional spreader bar.

The Kioti telescoping 3PH arms work very well as is and I see no need to mess with that system unless I were to get the Kioti "Euro-claws".

So having both types on your tractors do you find one significantly easier, better than the other?
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change
  • Thread Starter
#33  
Yes, I can provide you with the weld on Euro QH hook ends and balls as needed. $250 gets you 2 ends and 4 balls shipped USPS flat rate box.

It is an option for you to consider. ;)

Thank you Brian, I will put that in the mix to consider. Right now it's all still stirring around.
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #34  
So having both types on your tractors do you find one significantly easier, better than the other?

I have not done a lot of implement changing on the 1 1/2 month old Kioti, but I find it as easy as Pat's to hookup. With Pat's I have to dismount to attach the spreader bar, top link and lock in the side links. With the Kioti, I have to dismount to attach all three points, but it is quite easy, so I would call it a wash.

Others have mentioned that the extra length of the Pat's could be a problem with PTO shaft length, but I have not seen that. The Pat's are bit touchy to install and line up initially and do not have the "balls" for multi-dimensional movement. So, for installation and using I would give the nod to telescoping arms over the Pat's.
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #35  
Sure, with a couple of hundred pounds of implement on a compact tractor, small attachment adjustments are easy. When attaching a 1000 + pound implement, telescopic links are a must for me. Being able to back the tractor within 3 inches in any direction is a time & hassle saver. For Deere tractors: extending the links to the pins, then backing up till the links lock is a back & finger saver too. Telescopic draft links are worth the expense IMHO. Recently, Deere has made the telescopic links standard equipment on 5xxx series.

Unlevel attachments as mentioned by jgedmond is important when using back blades and land planes. How well do the hook systems handle the mis-alignment?
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #36  
Sure, with a couple of hundred pounds of implement on a compact tractor, small attachment adjustments are easy. When attaching a 1000 + pound implement, telescopic links are a must for me. Being able to back the tractor within 3 inches in any direction is a time & hassle saver. For Deere tractors: extending the links to the pins, then backing up till the links lock is a back & finger saver too. Telescopic draft links are worth the expense IMHO. Recently, Deere has made the telescopic links standard equipment on 5xxx series.

Unlevel attachments as mentioned by jgedmond is important when using back blades and land planes. How well do the hook systems handle the mis-alignment?

I don't think that it was me that mentioned unlevel attachments, but Pat's handles that quite well. Just get the hooks below the lower pin and lift to level the pins and connect. I have more problems when I don't get square and have to push the implement around using the pins. It still works, just a little more trouble. My heaviest implement at the moment is a 900 lb. flail mower, others are 500 - 700 lb.
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #37  
I don't think that it was me that mentioned unlevel attachments, but Pat's handles that quite well. Just get the hooks below the lower pin and lift to level the pins and connect. I have more problems when I don't get square and have to push the implement around using the pins. It still works, just a little more trouble. My heaviest implement at the moment is a 900 lb. flail mower, others are 500 - 700 lb.

When you mentioned the lack of ball ends, that's what I envisioned. Having to operate with the implement tilted by the draft links being different heights. Using a land plane on a road, one wants the left side of the plane (in the road center) to be just a bit higher. This creates a crown in the road for water run-off.
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #38  
3 of the reasons I bought my first Branson in 2007: Telescoping lift arm tips, telescoping lift arm stabilizers, and a lift control lever at the rear right where you are when you hook up.

I have Pat's on the 3000 and use the Cat II lift arms and adapter. They do extend the load another few inches making for more load to lift. The adjustable link connection between the lift arms (part of the regular price of the kit) is a must for non locking lift arms like the Fords with their floppy chains.....to get the hooks spaced for the width of the pins on the implement to be connected.

They are made to push against the implement for alignment meaning the tractor doesn't have to be perfectly square to the implement when connecting....get the top of the first to contact against that pin and slowly push on the implement (with tractor power) till the other side lines up and lift....connect your top link and away you go.

If you are using a rotary mower or something connecting the ground intermittently, ensuring that the lock nuts on the adapter bolts are secure is a must. If ALL your implements are setup on the standard dimensions then the $99 HF 3 pt would be a great idea.....problem for me is that they aren't...doubt that any 2 are the same.
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #39  
Been trying to see if there’s an aftermarket supplier of the telescopic arms and haven’t had much luck. Did find this Finnish company that sells both ball ends and the ball end hook quick connect. Don’t know if they have US distributor and shipping would probably make them too expensive. https://lhlift.fi/lataukset/Lower-link-arms_UK.pdf
 
   / Telescoping Lower Links vs Pat's Easy Change #40  
I believe that Kioti has the Euro styl QH hooks as an option. They simply replace the extendable link slide in part with a slide in hook. :cool:
The balls that the Euro hitch connect on are typically left in place on each implement. ;)
Top link QH also pictured.

That's exactly what I was referring to! Also those balls are used when mounting a lower category implement so that the smaller diametre pin fit better without slack.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2017 Ford F-250 4x4 Knapheide Service Truck (A50323)
2017 Ford F-250...
(3) VACUUM PUMP TANKS (A50854)
(3) VACUUM PUMP...
BW RVB3405 20,000lbs 5th Wheel Hitch Base (A50322)
BW RVB3405...
2023 Chevrolet Tahoe FL SUV (A48082)
2023 Chevrolet...
2018 GENIE GTH-5519 TELESCOPIC FORKLIFT (A51242)
2018 GENIE...
2021 GMC SIERRA CREW CAB TRUCK (A51406)
2021 GMC SIERRA...
 
Top