Tension roller on Woodland Mills WC88
- Thread starter Oz_Kioti
- Start date
- Views: 6593
Wow - those posts were over three years ago! But I'm still using that same set of belts today, so yes, I believe the increased diameter idler has made a significant improvement to belt life.
The rest of the machine is thoughtfully designed, very well made, and functions nicely, so I'm still puzzled by their engineering decision to use such a small diameter OEM idler.
FatTire
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Messages
- 1,369
- Location
- Colorado
- Tractor
- Kubota L5740, Unimog 404 w/ snowblower, Deere 620i UTV, MX5100 (sold)
I just purchased a used WC88 off of FB Marketplace. The seller included a new set of belts, and said something like, "Here, you'll need these." I was surprised because on my old chipper (Bearcat) I've never changed the belt. Then when going over my new-to-me WC88 I was surprised at the radius of the belts at the idler, and at about that moment discovered the belts are coming apart on the inside. Found your old post when I searched on it.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2003
- Messages
- 26,508
- Location
- SE Michigan in the middle of nowhere
- Tractor
- Kubota M9000 HDCC3 M9000 HDC
I had and sold a Chinese chipper some years ago and never had a belt issue with it but I kept them fiddle string tight at all times and kept the pillow blocks well greased. Sold it for what I paid for it in about 2 hours on FBMP and I ran it on the back of one of my 90 horse Kubota's, which is why the base is so high up so I could run the pto driveline reasonably straight.
Attachments
jonsstihl
Veteran Member
it is one of the reasons I chose the WC68 over the WC88. If ever the hydraulics went south I could just plumb the drive roller to my remote hydraulics and keep the flywheel going with the PTO shaft. but the pto drives the Pump on the WC88.
