e.myers
Silver Member
All weights without loader.
Kubota Grand L4240 44 hp tractor= 3671
Kubota Grand L3940 40.5 hp tractor= 3627
Kubota Standard L4400 44 hp tractor= 3307
So, only 50lbs difference between the two grand L models.
And "only" 364lbs difference between the Standard and Grand L 44hp tractors.
Recognizing that not everyone puts front end loaders on their tractors, when you do put a front end loader on any of these tractors you already make up the difference.
If you take into consideration that everyone doesn't opt for the hydrostat, well that's another 130 lb lighter tractor in each of the models.
Also, once ballast is added to the tires (if ballast weren't added to the other tractor) you'd already pass the weight also.
In the grand scheme of things I guess the question is, is there going to be a noticable difference in the traction of a tractor that is down 364 lbs.
And then, if there is, since a lot of people opt for the R4 tires anyway, am I going to improve traction 364 pounds worth just by switching to the Ag R1's?
I understand that ballast is a part of it also (from a front end loader perspective and probably more so from a heavy rear implement perspective) but that's another topic.
Just curious as to everyones thoughts.
Overthinking as usual.
Kubota Grand L4240 44 hp tractor= 3671
Kubota Grand L3940 40.5 hp tractor= 3627
Kubota Standard L4400 44 hp tractor= 3307
So, only 50lbs difference between the two grand L models.
And "only" 364lbs difference between the Standard and Grand L 44hp tractors.
Recognizing that not everyone puts front end loaders on their tractors, when you do put a front end loader on any of these tractors you already make up the difference.
If you take into consideration that everyone doesn't opt for the hydrostat, well that's another 130 lb lighter tractor in each of the models.
Also, once ballast is added to the tires (if ballast weren't added to the other tractor) you'd already pass the weight also.
In the grand scheme of things I guess the question is, is there going to be a noticable difference in the traction of a tractor that is down 364 lbs.
And then, if there is, since a lot of people opt for the R4 tires anyway, am I going to improve traction 364 pounds worth just by switching to the Ag R1's?
I understand that ballast is a part of it also (from a front end loader perspective and probably more so from a heavy rear implement perspective) but that's another topic.
Just curious as to everyones thoughts.
Overthinking as usual.