TRIVA FUN

   / TRIVA FUN #641  
American Navy was afraid to land a Corsair on a Carrier.

Who figured it out & what was the trick ????

The Corsair was known as "Old Hose Nose" because of the length of the fuselage from the cockpit to the propeller, which was lengthened to accommodate a fuel tank. It of course obscured the vision of the pilot, which made it very difficult to land on a flight deck using conventional techniques. The British used the Corsair on some of its carriers, and figured out that instead of a conventional head-on approach, they could come in sideways with an abrupt turn to the deck and land without problems. The Corsair also had landing gear problems early on, but as I recall, they consulted with another manufacturer who had extensive experience with carrier aircraft and solved those problems. The bent wing, incidentally, was a design feature which allowed shortening and strengthening of the landing gear in order to accommodate the huge 13 foot propeller. The Corsair was better served with an experienced pilot, as it was huge, powerful and not as forgiving as some other aircraft.
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#642  
Most likely an H bomb which uses a A bomb as a fuse to get the hydrogen to fuse at the same temps and pressures as the center of the sun.

Good guess, but it were not an "H" bomb either.
 
   / TRIVA FUN #644  
Good guess, but it were not an "H" bomb either.

OK but there are A bombs and H bombs and neutron bombs but not much else. ( and who would need more) so what is the answer?
I am tired of this double post BS. I'm not going to take the time to delete any more of them. It is time for the site administrators to solve this problem.
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#645  
OK but there are A bombs and H bombs and neutron bombs but not much else. ( and who would need more) so what is the answer?
I am tired of this double post BS. I'm not going to take the time to delete any more of them. It is time for the site administrators to solve this problem.

Those old sea planes that I flew in could not get out of their own way. Much less a atomic bomb.

It was an Atomic Depth Charge.
 
   / TRIVA FUN #646  
Those old sea planes that I flew in could not get out of their own way. Much less a atomic bomb.

It was an Atomic Depth Charge.

That sounds like the atomic grenade that blew a hole in the ground 200 yards across that the average soldier could throw 150 feet.
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#647  
That sounds like the atomic grenade that blew a hole in the ground 200 yards across that the average soldier could throw 150 feet.

Pretty much, about like the Atomic cannon, another flop.

In1962 I went to the Reno Air Races & talked to the owner of Rare Bare ( Smirnoff Special if memory is correct. )

I ask him why they were using an R2800 engine. Why not use a more powerful engine like the R3350.

Guess what he told me.??????
 
   / TRIVA FUN #648  
Pretty much, about like the Atomic cannon, another flop.

In1962 I went to the Reno Air Races & talked to the owner of Rare Bare ( Smirnoff Special if memory is correct. )

I ask him why they were using an R2800 engine. Why not use a more powerful engine like the R3350.

Guess what he told me.??????
I'm sorry but I haven't a clue on that one. I'll just have to duck and cover under my school desk and hope the fall out doesn't kill me next week. :rolleyes:
 
   / TRIVA FUN #649  
Pretty much, about like the Atomic cannon, another flop.

In1962 I went to the Reno Air Races & talked to the owner of Rare Bare ( Smirnoff Special if memory is correct. )

I ask him why they were using an R2800 engine. Why not use a more powerful engine like the R3350.

Guess what he told me.??????

I'll take a WAG...the R2800 was more reliable and easier to maintain? I know the R2800 had its teething problems early on, with some overheating problems, but I believe they were eventually worked out. Not so sure the big engine was ever satisfactory.
 
   / TRIVA FUN #650  
Should we let this thread die???/

Henry Ford made a car out of ????? when there was a steel shortage.
It was so tough that even a sledge hammer would not dent it.

The material was reinforced phenolic made in sheet form and pressed and heat-cured in the desired shape. I remember seeing a picture of Henry Ford standing on the car hitting the trunk lid with a sledge hammer.
 
Last edited:
   / TRIVA FUN #651  
The Vaught F4U Corsair was WWII fighter that actually continued production after the war. It was manufactured by Vaught, Goodyear and Brewster. In action in the Pacific, it was flown from land bases, and later from carriers. It was known to the Japanese as "Whistling Death" because of the sound of the air through the oil coolers. It had a phenomenal kill ratio of 11 to 1 against the Japanese. T
here was one other American fighter aircraft that had a kill ratio significantly higher...19 to 1...what was it and who was the manufacturer?

P.S. I would highly recommend the book "Whistling Death", the story of the development of the Corsair, written by the test pilot, Boone T. Guyton. There is also another book that I highly recommend to you WWII buffs, entitled "Reach for the Sky", the story of a legless British pilot who flew Spitfires against the Germans using artificial legs. His name was Douglas Bader, and he lost his legs in a crash while showing off for some girls. He was a good pilot, and the British, being desperate for pilots, put him back in a fighter plane where he shot down something like 20 German aircraft.

Looks like I'm not getting any takers on this; the answer is the Grumman Hellcat. While it had the same engine as the Corsair, it was not quite as fast...but it was built by Grumman with extensive input from the pilots and was built with them in mind. It was faster and better armed than the Zero, and judging by the kill ratio...19 to 1...it was far superior. It was also easy to fly and very forgiving...an extremely important factor considering that the bulk of the pilots were young and relatively inexperienced. It also was built by Grumman, who had extensive experience with carrier aircraft, so it was designed with carrier service in mind. If my recollection is correct, it was in full service by the Summer of 1943, replacing the Grumman Wildcat...except for those Wildcats kept in service on the jeep carries in anti-submarine service. The Corsair didn't see extensive carrier service until much later, summer of 1944 I believe.

An interesting side note; the Grumman Bearcat, which was in every way superior to the Zero, did not see service in WWII, although they were being manufactured and loaded on to the carriers as the war ended. The French used them in Indochina later.
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#652  
The R2800 was a strong, rugged &* reliable engine, that would take a lot of abuse.
I trained on it in a Hellcat.

The R3350 was a good engine if not abused. Over boosted or over leaned really hurt it.
Most of my career it was the engine I worked on.
It did almost achieve the magic HP rating of 1 HP to 1 pound of weight.

Normal max boost on round engines was 29.5 Inches of Mercury. If memory is correct at 32.5 inches for 1 minuet was an automatic engine change.

At Reno the run 78+ inches of mercury & that would blow cylinders off a 3350.

It sure is a thrill when 5 unlimited planes come buy. The ground shakes.

New Questions

What is the great circle???

What is 10% lean???
 
   / TRIVA FUN #653  
The R2800 was a strong, rugged &* reliable engine, that would take a lot of abuse.
I trained on it in a Hellcat.

The R3350 was a good engine if not abused. Over boosted or over leaned really hurt it.
Most of my career it was the engine I worked on.
It did almost achieve the magic HP rating of 1 HP to 1 pound of weight.

Normal max boost on round engines was 29.5 Inches of Mercury. If memory is correct at 32.5 inches for 1 minuet was an automatic engine change.

At Reno the run 78+ inches of mercury & that would blow cylinders off a 3350.

It sure is a thrill when 5 unlimited planes come buy. The ground shakes.

New Questions

What is the great circle???

What is 10% lean???

In navigation, the shortest route between two points on a globe. Usually loops up northwards and then back down.

10% lean - can't even do a WAG.

Harry K
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#654  
In navigation, the shortest route between two points on a globe. Usually loops up northwards and then back down.

10% lean - can't even do a WAG.

Harry K

Right on the great circle.

10% lean is a 10% loss of power. On a constant sped propeller it is measured my a Mean barametrec pressure or torque gauge.
Best fuel mileage you can get with out damage to the engine.
On a light plane with a fixed pitch propeller - Lean it out until it coughs & push in too clicks.
At take off power engines are run a very rich mixture to help cool the engine.

Sure wish some of you other folks would ask some questions. BE nice if some of you lookers would chime in.


The American space race you hear about Werner Von Braun mentioned a lot.
But he was not the true pioneer of space flight. In fact Werner used some of his patents in build the V-2 rocket.
Who was this person????
 
   / TRIVA FUN
  • Thread Starter
#656  
The American space race you hear about Werner Von Braun mentioned a lot.
But he was not the true pioneer of space flight. In fact Werner used some of his patents in build the V-2 rocket.
Who was this person???? [/quote.]
Goddard.?
Robert Goddard: American Father of Rocketry

I wonder if many people know that. Doubt the younger generation has any idea.

During WW2 in the south Pacific there were some planes called the "Black Cats".
What plane was it & how did it get its name????
 
   / TRIVA FUN #657  
I don't remember the exact model number but they were painted black for night flights and recon missions. One was named "Lady in the dark";)
 
   / TRIVA FUN #659  
During WW2 in the south Pacific there were some planes called the "Black Cats".
What plane was it & how did it get its name????

Catalina's painted black for night missions
 
   / TRIVA FUN #660  
MK3 and MK4 SMLE rifles were fielded by a major power in WWII.

What country fielded these rifles? What was their caliber designation? and what does the letters SMLE stand for?
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2022 New Holland C327 Compact Track Loader (A56438)
2022 New Holland...
AEREATOR (A58214)
AEREATOR (A58214)
2019 Yongfu Scooter (A59231)
2019 Yongfu...
2012 Chevrolet Camaro Coupe (A59231)
2012 Chevrolet...
INTERNATIONAL FLAT BED TRUCK (A52707)
INTERNATIONAL FLAT...
M998 (A55852)
M998 (A55852)
 
Top