EddieWalker
Epic Contributor
JimR said:Eddie,
One of those contractors I mentioned told me it would cost him over $10K in lawyers fees to try and get his $15K owed to him. Not to mention his time going back and forth with the courts and hearings. We have already spent over $3K in our suit against our neighbors and the papers haven't even been filed yet. I wish laywers up here worked for $100.00 an hour.
Hey Jim,
I know a few guys that get burned all the time. They do a job and then get stiffed. They feel it's not worth the hassle and expense of going to court to get paid for what they did. I disagree and will eagerly take somebody to court if they owe me for something I've done. I've found that those who allow this to happen, often have it happen to them all the time. I also find that a strongly worded letter is very effective most of the time to get slow paying clients to pay up.
If a client owed by $15,000, I wouldn't hesitate to spend $10,000 or more to get it. I'd also sue them for legal fee and my additional time. They can pay the $15,000 today or twice that when it's all said and done.
Once you win the case, I know there's no gurantee of payment anyway, but the money is owed and interest adds to that amount. I've come across quite a few real estate deals that have liens on them. After the property sells, the lien holders get paid. Wether it's the bank or a contractor or whoever. The owner of the property only gets what's left. These line amounts can be substantial over the years and most of the time the hiers selling the property don't even know about it.
It's money in the bank. I don't have a lien on anybodies property, but I'd consider it a good investment if I did. It wouldn't bother me at all to wait 20 or 30 years to collect on it becaue I know one day that it will happen. To me that's a thousand times better than just walking away from money owed to me for work I did with nothing to show for it, ever.
I wasn't trying to be accurate on lawyer fees. I know of many lawyers that charge $300 an hour and have heard of those who charge twice that much.
I also agree wtih you that the original bid of $60,000 isn't even close to the final bill. What I'm not clear on is wether that original bid was for the entire job or just for labor? Was the final bill for labor and materals? I'd think it would be very dificult to bid materials on a job like his, and since he mentioed that he was buying materials at a marked up price, that it was a seperate issue.
What was the original bid for? If labor, what was the final bill for labor only? How far off is it?
I feel sorry for 40kchicks, but I also don't think we've heard all the details of what happened. Not that he's intentionally misleading us, but maybe he didn't understand what goes on in construction or working with contractors and subs. It's real easy to make assumptions when you have no background in these things that lead to a situation like this.
Nobody has said how many hours were worked or what the materials bill was. It's premature to conclude that the contractor is a thief or crooked without knowing these things.
Eddie