What a Joke

   / What a Joke #41  
Did not know that. I don't think I ever saw where it was assembled when I had that 2500 Hemi I traded for my F-250 PSD.

Chris
 
   / What a Joke #42  
Kahuna said:
I have a new 2007 Tundra Double Can version. It is rated to pull 10,300 and that is the trailer only not including the truck weight. I pull a 30 foot goose neck trailer that is 6000 lbs empty, my trailer gross weight is actually in the 11,000 plus category. I traded in a 2004 F250 crew cab with the 5.4 gas. This Toyota will run circles around the F250. I am talking gas engines here. If my Ford would have had the diesel I probably would have kept it.

Don't say too much bad about the Tundra until you have owned one. I feel there is absolutely no comparison to any other half ton and I have had Ford's and Chevy's in the past. I look at the Tundra as being somewhere between a half and a three quarter ton. It only needs heavier tires and a little more spring. The brakes, rear end, transmission and engine are there now.

If you are towing that much weight on a regular basis please let us know after 30,000 to 50,000 miles how it is doing.

The frame is no where near any 3/4 ton and from the hands on comparisons that I have done it is not all that impressive.

Yes, it has a large ring gear but still uses a semi-floating rear axle instead of a full floating rear axle.

The transmission has not proven itself over time (inc. heavy use). It has proven to have problems duing the initial release (supposedly fixed).

Yes, performance is rather impressive, but at a cost of fuel economy. (There have been cam issues, but claimed to now be fixed). They had an opportunity to get some incredible fuel economy ratings but came up short even when equipped with a 6 speed tranny. (GM does better with 4sp.) Using a high axle ratio (4.33 or 4.51 not in the mood to look it up right now) gives great acceleration but kills fuel economy.

Comparing the Toy 5.7 to a Ford 5.4 is a bad comparison. Yes, Ford should have kept a 351 then we could have a real comparison. At the same time I would not compare the Ford V10 to the Toy V8.

Also, please be careful with the tailgate. It has got to be the lightest tailgate that I have ever seen. Who in their right mind would put an almost full width access panel across the inside. It effectively removes all strenght from the top (back) edge of the gate when it is in the down position. If you don't have a bed liner have somebody walk across the gate (200# person) and watch it flex.

If you are like the average person who buys a 1/2 ton truck as a daily driver and tows a few times a year then this post will not apply to you. You bought a decent truck, are sending profits to Japan, and contributing to reason that US companies are laying people off.

If you do use it as a truck to tow that much weight, I wish you the best of luck, but please let the rest of us know when and where you are towing so we can stay away from that area. (That applies to anybody using a 1/2 ton to tow that much weight.)

Kurt
 
   / What a Joke #43  
Builder said:
BTW:Dodge 3/4 & 1 tons are assembled in Mexico and have been since about 2000 give or take a year.

Builder beat me to it. Accurate and unfortunate. Nonetheless we are quite happy with our Ram 2500/Cummins.
 
   / What a Joke #45  
The Tundra is 75% to 80% American parts with all the major components coming from the US. Most of the electrical is from Japan. Sure, some of the profits may go overseas but that is with every make. Believe it or not, we are in a global economy.

There are more American parts in Toyota than in any Chrysler product. I had my hands on a chart here about a month ago that listed the top 10 vehicles sold in the US that had the most domestic parts. The list was model specific as some vehicles have more American parts while some have more foreign parts. The Ford F150 was number one for having the most American parts with 80 some percent. The Chevy trucks were also in the 10 top ten. The Tundra was number 10. This list included cars too. Of the top 10 vehicles (cars and trucks) sold in the US that use the most US parts, Toyota had the top three spots (it was the Tundra and two car models). There was not one Chrysler on the list.

It is correct that I would not pull those type heavy loads on an everyday basis, I think one would be a fool to think a gas engine would hold up over time, unless possibly it was the V10. I was tired of the 5.4 gas F250 not having any pulling power, as a matter of fact it seemed like it would barely pull itself and I was getting a consistent 11-12 mpg. The day I went truck shopping to trade it off I was looking for a late model F250 diesel. I just happened to drive by a Toyota dealer and took a test drive, that was all it took. I know I was only an occasional heavy trailer puller so I was more concerned about everyday performance rather than regular heavy pulling power. If I pulled all the time I would have opted for the diesel.

As far as economy, none of them are worth a darn for all the technology in the drive train. First of all a 4x4 is going to get a mile or two less than a 2 wheel drive so I have that going against me. However, I was getting 11-12 mpg with the 5.4 Ford (F250) and Tundra is in the 15-17 mpg range with a lot more snap. People with the 4x4 F150 and Silverado around here are pretty consistent in the 15 mpg range as well. The 2 wheel drive Silverado can sometimes get 17-18 according to my son who bought a new one.

I am not looking to get in an argument with anyone because I know how some people can get emotional about their trucks. I have always been a big fan of the Ford and GM products and never considered a foreign made vehicle. But that's just it, they are no longer a foreign made vehicle. To me this Tundra seems as American as any full size truck only with a different logo.
 
   / What a Joke #46  
Kahuna said:
I am not looking to get in an argument with anyone because I know how some people can get emotional about their trucks. I have always been a big fan of the Ford and GM products and never considered a foreign made vehicle. But that's just it, they are no longer a foreign made vehicle. To me this Tundra seems as American as any full size truck only with a different logo.

It seems like you made the right decision for you and that's what counts. The only place I think you're going wrong is that profits leave the USA and go overseas when you buy foreign. If you buy an American truck, the profits stay here and help the American companies get stronger.

The US gov't has a different corp income tax structure for GM & Ford than it does for companies that build here, but have their headquarters overseas. Those companies pay lower corp taxes and IMO, have an unfair advantage. That's a big problem I have with the US gov't, not Toyota or Nissan, etc.. The US car companies have to import cheaper parts to stay competitive since they're operating on lower profit margins. Take a look at the primaries in MI today. Look what they're discussing...the future of Detroit & Flint MI as the remaining epicenter of US auto business. It's walking up the hangman's ladder to the gallows right now. Do we want to save it? Our votes count.

I can no longer have a problem with buying foreign. I have no choice. Unfortunately, my house is filled with foreign electronics, toys for my kids, appliances, tools, etc.
 
   / What a Joke #47  
Your point is well taken.
 
   / What a Joke #48  
Kahuna said:
Your point is well taken.

Thanks. I'm not trying to lay guilt on you, but I really think a lot of Americans just don't realize the playing field isn't level and US gov't over-regulation, unfair US corp tax structures, and huge "legacy costs" from the UAW make it tough for American car companies to compete.

You gotta vote if you want that to change. ;)
 
   / What a Joke #49  
Folks, let's please remember that politics is a prohibited topic on Tractorbynet.
 
   / What a Joke #50  
zzvyb6 said:
The Toyota is NOT rated to pull a 10,000 lb trailer, its a 10,000 lb combination. Since the truck weighs 6000 lbs itself when loaded with fuel and passengers, you can only haul a 4000 lb trailer with a Tundra.

GM rates its towing differently. No industry standard. Some manufacturers give max TRAILER weight with the truck at empty gas tank and just driver load.

The Tundra does not have enough brakes to stop ITSELF very well, much less with a trailer. Something your RECALL notices should have pointed out.

The trailer in those fancy ads was aluminum and EMPTY.
The truck is rated to tow 10,300lbs;The GCWR(gross combined weight rating)meaning truck-trailer-and trailer load is 16,000lbs as per the Toyota manual. I am totally impressed with this ONE HALF TON's towing ability.I don't need a 3/4 or 1 ton, with the accompanying harsh ride, for my towing purposes.I never tow anything over 8500/9000 and it does that very well, thank you:cool:
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Adams 5 ton Fertilizer Buggy / Wagon (A52748)
Adams 5 ton...
Chery 6' 10 Drawer Workbench (A50121)
Chery 6' 10 Drawer...
New/Unused 12ft x 7.4ft x 8.2ft Container (A51573)
New/Unused 12ft x...
2013 Chevrolet Caprice Sedan (A50324)
2013 Chevrolet...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2015 John Deere 5085M (A50120)
2015 John Deere...
 
Top