??? What law is that under?A locking safe to transport firearms legally in CA to the range.
Pursuant to California Penal Code section 25610, a United States citizen over 18 years of age who is not prohibited from firearm possession, and who resides or is temporarily in California, may transport by motor vehicle any handgun provided it is unloaded and locked in the vehicle's trunk or in a locked container.??? What law is that under?
Gotcha, so a hard sided case would meet the spec., doesn’t necessarily have to be a “safe”, correct?Pursuant to California Penal Code section 25610, a United States citizen over 18 years of age who is not prohibited from firearm possession, and who resides or is temporarily in California, may transport by motor vehicle any handgun provided it is unloaded and locked in the vehicle's trunk or in a locked container.
It has to be a lockable case, so I suppose a poly box would do. A keyed lock is all that is what was suggested to me. The glovebox and center console are not approved because it is too easy to defeat those locks. So unloaded and locked in a box separate from ammo is my understanding of the law. I'm unsure if a biometric lock is acceptable in a car.Gotcha, so a hard sided case would meet the spec., doesn’t necessarily have to be a “safe”, correct?



), so I bought this one. Back home is when I saw the screws had backed out and now it's ok too. I use it all the time so wire wheel on one, disk on other.Took them a check this morning.New AC for the house. A 4 ton unit. Installed and taxes just under $7K.
Not much off the cost of my first new car.
Bought a large set of combination metric wrenches from HF so I have an easier time checking frame and loader bolts on the tractor every 25h or so.
View attachment 830243do the lossen up that quick, really?
The new suburu cars are not as good, like many things they have been ruined by federal mandates, EPA, cheap construction and that lousy transmission. 2014 was a great year for the Forrester though.I cannot understand why Subaru insists on continuing to build flat-4 engines. This nonsense of keeping the weight low is complete fluff. The engines are not powerful, are known for having several possible issues - including high oil consumption and headgasket failure - and are more difficult to work on. The CVT transmission, while efficient, is not durable and I do not like the feel or drone. The cars themselves are just OK. They feel cheaply made with thin metal doors and roofs, despite Subaru trying to market how safe they are. However, the Outback and Forester are roomy, fuel efficient, have a good AWD system, and are value priced. I guess that's why people like them.