deerseeker001
Super Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 5,699
- Location
- Central wisconsin
- Tractor
- International 2500a with Loader
I also use the tractor with front end loader and back-blade cant beat it,moves a lot of snow fast.
I really like using my rear blade for plowing in reverse, with one major gripe: The blade tends to ride up on hard pack snow, frequently I want to compress a snow pile and push it backward, and the instead the blade rides up. Has anyone had success in eliminating that by adding weight to their rear blade?
grsthegreat,
Having built a very similar rear hydraulic power pack and tractor loader mounted snow blower I can say "Quick Attach" has a very fair price for the complete package. Well done "Quick Attach"! After 4 months of "building" it took me about 10 seconds to realize, "hey, I am looking forward and blowing snow"! One difference is I mounted the Prince 20 gpm PTO pump on the same 3ph frame that carries the 25 gallon tank.................... I fabbed a PTO drive shaft to make an easy hook-up. The all cast-iron Prince pump weighs 70 lbs and the DIY drive shaft weighs about 20 lbs........................ at my age it was the way to go!
Great job "grsthegreat" getting it all mounted and tuned up................... thanks for lending me a hand via TBN getting mine tuned up!
I had an ancient rear blade (probably a Ford since is was blue). Although the blade was quite heavy, I had the same problem you describe. I had a couple weights (hammers from a hammer mill...weight was at least 80 lbs each and probably more). That helped considerably when pushing with the convex side (which tended to rise up more then the concave side of the blade).
So, adding weight helped me. The worst part of the job was loading the weights on the blade (due to the weight).
However, I started using the concave side of the blade (driving forward). As long as the area to be plowed is fairly flat, this method worked great and a lot less hassle. I did get some gravel in the grass though since I had the blade angled about 30 degrees. This method, in combination with the loader bucket, did the job for me...give it a try. Pulling the blade is less likely to result in damage to your lower lift arms too, in case you hit something like a curb.
RoyJackson, your photo of yourself reminds me of a joke. A guy walks into a bar, and he has a frog sticking out of his forehead. So, the bartender exclaims, holy smokes, how id THAT happen? And the frogs says, "I don't know. He just grew out of my a _ _ one day!":laughing:
I had an ancient rear blade (probably a Ford since is was blue). Although the blade was quite heavy, I had the same problem you describe. I had a couple weights (hammers from a hammer mill...weight was at least 80 lbs each and probably more). That helped considerably when pushing with the convex side (which tended to rise up more then the concave side of the blade).
So, adding weight helped me. The worst part of the job was loading the weights on the blade (due to the weight).
However, I started using the concave side of the blade (driving forward). As long as the area to be plowed is fairly flat, this method worked great and a lot less hassle. I did get some gravel in the grass though since I had the blade angled about 30 degrees. This method, in combination with the loader bucket, did the job for me...give it a try. Pulling the blade is less likely to result in damage to your lower lift arms too, in case you hit something like a curb.
Yes I think when you get down to the nickels and dimes of it a pickup mounted plow is the most cost effective for anything less then a full town or state road. The catch is that you NEED a backup of some kind for those times when it drifts in on you faster then you can buck it back or when you just screw up and get stuck. Unless you have friends with able equipment handy by or other equipment in you stable a tractor, well set up, is more reliable if not cheaper day in and day out.