You're right, I am kidding. No way Toyota can catch up with GM.
Seriously, though, GM quality has improved by leaps and bounds. I have owned two Hondas and a Toyota. None was perfect; one Accord, a 2001 purchased brand new, was actually pretty bad in terms of problems (driver seat broke and had to be replaced at 12k miles, and the transmission failed, disabled the car and had to be replaced at 25k problems, and there were a number of minor issues too). Hond had so many transmission failures with Accords that year they had to extend the transmission warranty to 100k miles. The Toyota Corolla I had was a 1992 and was fairly reliable for what it was, but was absurdly under-engineered with tiny, tiny tires, poor brakes, sloppy suspension (worse than an 80's Buick), no real safety features, steel wheels that peeled their paint and then rusted, bad seat belt location, and a few other minor things. It was reliable basic transportation, but it definitely wasn't the best car ever made.
I just bought a Chevy Suburban (literally last night) and the quality and design is really, really impressive. If you haven't looked at what GM is making these days, you should. Their products are highly competitive.
My dad owns a first gen Toyota Tundra. It has been pretty good, but far from perfect. The brakes have been worked on by the dealer 3 times while it was still under warranty, and I understand brake problems were common with the first gen Tundra. He also had the 4wd mode switch fail, which was also replaced under warranty. Stock suspension was very soft, though my dad put in better shocks when the originals wore out. No one close to me owns the 2008 Tundra but I certainly have read enough about problems with them. Plus my dad liked gen 1 because it was 90% size and very convenient. Gen 2 is 101% size and not so convenient.