will it take off?

/ will it take off? #341  
GIJOE said:
Yes it will take off!!!

Planes takeoff and land, with, against, perpendicular and any angle in between for that matter, from a naturally occurring conveyor every day and it doesn't matter what the wind speed or wind direction is. It's called the rotation of the earth. At the equator, the earth rotates just over 1000 mph and decreases to zero at the north and south poles.


Keep trying. That's like saying if I jump off the ground when I land I'll be 10 blocks away. Or if I toss a frenchfry to my son in the back seat it'll put an eye out(just a toss, not a fast fry!!).

And only Superman can stop, speed up, reverse the earth rotation! So please lets use facts we can verify!
 
/ will it take off? #342  
Sorry I missed the beginning of this thread. Schmism, you devil you. :rolleyes: Anyway, I was on vacation, and when I got back I was out on my tractor. Well, I finally came in and turned on the computer and saw this thread. You wouldn’t have had such passionate responses to the question: Blue, green, or orange gear or hydro synthetic. Tractors are still kinda new to me but I do know a thing or two about airplanes. So here are some analogies that might get you non-believers over on the side of truth, freedom, and the TBN way.

I’m not going to debate the interpretation of the wording of the question. I think it’s pretty clear, but then again, others don’t always see things the way I do. Therefore, this is mainly for those who see the “Magic Conveyor Belt” (or MCB) as the stumbling block to this airplane’s eventual stabilized departure. I will use real world materials for my ideal airplane which will help you envision the reality a little easier. I will also use real world physics, with the exception of the movement of said conveyor belt. Here goes…

The Plane: The ideal plane would have a very large aspect ratio (think glider wing) and a very large thrust to weight ratio (powerful engine, light plane). The one that jumps to mind is the U2 (that Kelly Johnson was amazing). Change out the engine with say an F100 (F15, F16 engine… gobs of power) or something similar. The tires would need to be very hard and smooth, almost slick with very high air pressure. Oh, I know how about this… solid Teflon. Then we’ll change out the wheel bearings and axles. New super-high speed, high temp, roller bearings and axles. No holds barred when you’re dealing with magic.

The Set Up: Now the next thing you need to understand is that there is no mechanical connection between the conveyor belt and the airplane. There is friction (mass, gravity, coefficients and all that garbage), but that’s it. Also, there is no mechanical connection between the wheels and the airplane. Now it’s getting good. The wheels spin freely. Spin em’ forward, backwards, stop them, the plane doesn’t care.

The Analogies: What happens when an airliner touches down during landing? It doesn’t stop immediately does it? When the wheels first touch the runway their rotation is zero even though they are moving through the air at say 140 knots. As the wheels contact the ground friction comes into play. There is a puff of smoke as the rubber boils and vaporizes due to the friction between the ground and the tires. It sometimes takes over a hundred feet for the tires to spin up to a speed where there is no longer slippage and… friction increases. This is key. Friction decreases as the speed between the objects increase. More on this in a second. The airliner hasn’t slowed down a bit from this violent impact. Ground spoilers and thrust reversers are deployed to reduce the lift from the wings and increase friction between the tires and runway to allow the brakes to stop the plane.

The next analogy for you ground bound folks. Take an older car or truck i.e. no anti-skid brakes. You’re cruisin’ at highway speeds, say 80-90 mph… err… I mean 55-65 mph and slam on the brakes. Smoke rubber on pavement, but you don’t stop for a couple of hundred feet.

The Flight Test: With our souped up U2 on the MCB runway with just enough fuel for a short flight and all unneeded instrumentation removed, we’re ready. Now if the MCB wanted to maximize friction it would spin up slowly to maintain an equal speed between the wheels and the belt, but if it did that, the U2 would be 1000 ft in the air before you could blink. Instead the MCB will spin up instantaneously to a thousand, a million, a billion revolutions per second, faster than the speed of light. At witch point the MCB will disappear into the space/time continuum. The U2 will then fall to the ground and takeoff normally.

Sorry, I couldn’t resist. So, as the U2 pilot applies full afterburner and full nose up pitch, the MCB will try to rotate the wheels to restrict the airplanes forward movement. It won’t be able to, remember the analogies? The MCB can accelerate instantly (remember it’s magic) but the wheels have mass and only friction can come into play. The MCB will begin to move the wheels, but by then the U2 will move forward gliding on its super-slick bearings increasing lift and in turn decreasing friction between the tires and belt even more. Lots of smoke and some burned up Teflon tires, but the plane will be flying.

I know I said that I wasn’t going to debate semantics, but…

“a plane is standing on a movable runway( something like a conveyor).as the plane moves the conveyor moves but in the opposite direction. the conveyor has a system that tracks the speed of the plane and matches it exactly in the opposite direction”

Where is the magic conveyor belt? :confused:

Now pardon me I’ve got some work to do… on my TRACTOR. :D
 
/ will it take off? #343  
WOW Blue...that was certainly a lot of typing. :)

The MCB is sort of a hypothical thing and I think everyone gets hung up on it. The MCB doesn't need to go up to light speed or anything. Our fastest plane is only capible of Mach 3 or so. Plus that plane..SR-71 doesn't go 0-mach 3 in .0025 seconds. The initial roll out of a jet or prop is pretty slow...generally speaking.
 
/ will it take off? #344  
RobJ,

Yea, I know its a lot of typing, but I kinda felt like I missed out on something. :(

"The MCB is sort of a hypothical thing and I think everyone gets hung up on it. The MCB doesn't need to go up to light speed or anything. Our fastest plane is only capible of Mach 3 or so. Plus that plane..SR-71 doesn't go 0-mach 3 in .0025 seconds. The initial roll out of a jet or prop is pretty slow...generally speaking."

And thats my point the plane does not have to be fast. The MCB only has the relatively small tire ground contact patch to apply any force to the plane and then only to the tire, not to the airframe. The U2 in my example was not meant to be fast, but to have a very short ground roll and power to overcome any drag the MCB could possibly apply. It can't possibly stop the plane from moving. Another analogy, put a weight on a piece of paper on a table and pull the paper slowly across the table. Friction keeps the weight on the paper. Now pull the paper quickly. Friction is overcome and the weight remains stationary. The paper is the conveyor, the weight is the plane. The plane will take off.
 
/ will it take off? #345  
NorthwestBlue said:
RobJ,

Yea, I know its a lot of typing, but I kinda felt like I missed out on something. :(

"The MCB is sort of a hypothical thing and I think everyone gets hung up on it. The MCB doesn't need to go up to light speed or anything. Our fastest plane is only capible of Mach 3 or so. Plus that plane..SR-71 doesn't go 0-mach 3 in .0025 seconds. The initial roll out of a jet or prop is pretty slow...generally speaking."

And thats my point the plane does not have to be fast. The MCB only has the relatively small tire ground contact patch to apply any force to the plane and then only to the tire, not to the airframe. The U2 in my example was not meant to be fast, but to have a very short ground roll and power to overcome any drag the MCB could possibly apply. It can't possibly stop the plane from moving. Another analogy, put a weight on a piece of paper on a table and pull the paper slowly across the table. Friction keeps the weight on the paper. Now pull the paper quickly. Friction is overcome and the weight remains stationary. The paper is the conveyor, the weight is the plane. The plane will take off.
No. If the tires have enuf traction to overcome engine thrust the magical conveyor could hold the plane stationary by applying a force, equal&opposite to engine thrust, to the tires. This thrust would rotationally accelerate the mass of the wheels. As long as the wheels, tires and bearings could withstand the increasing rpm the plane would not move.
 
/ will it take off? #346  
SPYDERLK said:
No. If the tires have enuf traction to overcome engine thrust the magical conveyor could hold the plane stationary by applying a force, equal&opposite to engine thrust, to the tires. This thrust would rotationally accelerate the mass of the wheels. As long as the wheels, tires and bearings could withstand the increasing rpm the plane would not move.

SPYDERLK: Don't need and don't want traction in this scenario. Try this... go get a small toy with free moving wheels (Hot Wheels car, train, or the like). Put a sheet of paper on a smooth surface. Place the vehicle on the paper so that you are looking at the side of it. Now move the paper back and forth rapidly in the direction of the wheels (make them roll). What happens? Now push the vehicle with your finger at the same time as you pull the paper out in the opposite direction. What happens? Same theory, same physics, just a smaller scale (like wind tunnel testing).
 
/ will it take off? #348  
Tom, I don't know why but my browser or some limitation doesn't let me insert smilies.

As to the response I gave. If you knew me better you'd know it was tongue in cheek, mostly. Some of the hypersonic stuff, I thought, was particularly inspired.

Aircraft like sailboats (sound familiiar?) operate on relative wind. Unless a conveyor belt made the plane go backward before it developed enough thrust to move forward it would have little effect on the takeoff. Sure there might be more rolling resistance of the tires and bearing resistance if anything made the wheels rotate faster that the air speed.

Once the plane developed enough thrust to overcome static friction and start rolling forward the conveyor belt is just about as involved as the color of the tie worn by the third onlooker. The aircraft would take off pretty much as if there were no conveyor belt.

Now, if we have a sealed opaque box with a bird in it, can we use a sensitive scales to determine if the bird is perching or airborn knowing the weight of the box and bird separately?

Pat (//INSERT SMILING FACE ICON//)
 
/ will it take off? #349  
Sometimes it helps to work these problems backwards. Lets expand on the original question to gain a better understanding.

A plane from another airport is visiting our airport with the magical conveyor belt to do touch and goes. As the airplane does his approach for landing, the magic conveyor belt automatically matches the planes speed, because thats what it does. It magically matches the speed of any plane either taking off or landing. The planes landing speed is 60knots, so the conveyor is doing 60 knots backwards as the plane lands.
Does it:
A). immediately come to a stop
B). land normally
C). The plane lands nomally but the wheels are doing 120 knots.

The correct answer is C.

Now the second part of the touch and go. The plane needs a takeoff speed of 100 knots, so once the plane is down and going 60 knots, the pilot gives it full throttle and accelerates up to 100 knots. The MCB does what it does and accelerates up to 100 knots as the plane does.
Does the plane:
A). immediately come to a stop
B). takeoff normally
C). Takeoff normally but the wheels are doing 200 knots.

The correct answer is C.

If you dont agree with these answers you need to explain why because it seems very basic to me.
 
/ will it take off? #350  
Some of you guys just don't get HOW a plane takes off/flies!

A plane doesn't take off the way a car moves. It doesn't transfer anything to the ground in order to move or to take off. It takes off INDEPENDENT of the ground! The ground just happens to be the thing it's RESTING on before it takes off. As the plane applied power, it WILL move forward irregardless of how fast the "conveyor" moves. Unless this "magic conveyor" can CAPTURE the surrounding air and move it in the OPPOSITE direction keeping the plane from achieving any air speed, the plane WILL move forward. The ONLY thing that will be affected are the tires that will be spinning REALLY fast.

As long as you don't affect the surrounding AIR, The plane will take off as normal with REALLY fast spinning tires...
 
/ will it take off? #352  
A nice trout sounds better Moss.

Buggiesd are always transpoted in a container requireing them to be in flight. Keeps the weight down you know!:D
 
/ will it take off? #353  
AS tired as I am of this thread, I cannot stay away from it. This plane has circled the globe 8 times by now but I keep watching it come 'round again....
 
/ will it take off? #355  
rback33 said:
AS tired as I am of this thread, I cannot stay away from it. This plane has circled the globe 8 times by now but I keep watching it come 'round again....

But the question is, did it circle the globe in the air or on the belt?


Real world question -- back a couple of pages a new to the thread poster stated that airliner wheels are stationary when the plane touches down. I thought they had fins in the wheels kind of like turbo blades that cause them to be accelerated by the air so they have some spin when they first touch the ground. If not, it seems they should -- it would save some tire wear and also cool the brakes.
 
/ will it take off? #356  
daTeacha said:
But the question is, did it circle the globe in the air or on the belt?


Real world question -- back a couple of pages a new to the thread poster stated that airliner wheels are stationary when the plane touches down. I thought they had fins in the wheels kind of like turbo blades that cause them to be accelerated by the air so they have some spin when they first touch the ground. If not, it seems they should -- it would save some tire wear and also cool the brakes.


I have no earthly idea, but I agree with you that the maybe they should...
 
/ will it take off? #358  
HTML:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5417387.html

One patent for rotating aircraft wheels before landing.
 
/ will it take off? #359  
That sucker will just never, ever lift off. We all know that air flow across a wing creates lift, right? If the plane is sitting still, with relation to the air, on the runway, the only air flow across the wing is the wind from the prop. We need a bunch of air flow on the rest of the wing to create lift enough for the plane to leave the ground.

So, what happens to all that energy the engine is creating if it doesn't result in lift on the wing?

Friction in the tires rolling on that ever increasing speed of the conveyor belt runway, not to mention the bearings inside the hubs. It's a neat topic for speculation though.
 
/ will it take off? #360  
There isn't that much friction in the bearings. The engines thrust should be able to overcome it very easily, especially in the early stages of rollout. Any plane with decently maintained bearings, and a reasonable thrust to weight ratio has clearance and the ability to take off from the magic conveyor belt, in not too much more distance than a normal takeoff would need.
 

Marketplace Items

2019 GENIE S-60XC TELESCOPIC BOOM LIFT (A62129)
2019 GENIE S-60XC...
2000 Mack RD688S Dump Truck, VIN # 1M2P270C1YM049400 (A61165)
2000 Mack RD688S...
DSP 900 Balancer with Split Weight (A63118)
DSP 900 Balancer...
2025 Kubota SVL75-3HFWCC High Flow Cab Track Loader - 70 hours
2025 Kubota...
New/Unused Landhonor 24in Semi-Automatic Tire Changer (A61166)
New/Unused...
2007 TRAILMOBILE 53X 102 T/A DRY VAN TRAILER (A59909)
2007 TRAILMOBILE...
 
Top