- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 66,021
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
The trick is to identify the most-used light sources and replace them.
That's what I am experimenting with. I have a back porch light that is on 24/7. I had a 40W bulb in there and it would croak about every month or two. So I replaced it with a 13W CFL. I wrote the date on the side of it with a marker. I just went out and looked. 9/6/2008. So, it has lasted longer than any incandescent bulb so far and used 70% less energy.
40W x 24H x 90D = 89400w or 89kwh x $0.11kwh = $9.79 to run that bulb for 90 days.
13W x 24H x 90D = 28080w or 28kwh x $0.11kwh = $3.08 to run that bulb for 90 days.
I saved $6.71 in three months in electricity on one bulb.
Subtract the cost of the bulb... about $2.00 and add in the price of the two incandescent bulbs I would have used, about $1.00 and I still came out over $5.00 ahead in three months, or $20.00 in a year (or more if the CFL lasts longer). That is a significant savings on just one light bulb that is run 24/7.
Lights that only run a few hours a day will take much longer to get payback and that is only if the CFL can take the on-off cycles which I do not know, yet. I have another in my kitchen and three more in my basement that get on-off a few times a day. I dated them, too and will keep track for myself to see how they compared to the incandescents they replaced.
What I do not like about them is they cannot be used on my dimmers and most of the lights in our house are dimmable. The cost of dimmable CFLs is too much for me right now.