gsganzer
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2003
- Messages
- 3,197
- Location
- Denton, TX
- Tractor
- L3800 w/FEL and BH77, BX 2200 w/FEL and MMM
For the anti Nuke crowd..... did you realize that if you had all the waste from every plant ever built to deal with, you only need a hole 1/2 the size of Manhattan Island? It is a risk vs reward vs cost per watt deal.
You are grown men and all have internet connected computers. Take off the rose colored glasses and propose a better, more efficient, more cost effective solution than nuclear power to reduce emissions and consumption of resources.
And most of that waste was generated from plants that operate quite differently then the newest designs and before waste was processed and refined to make more fuel. I read an article that all of the waste generated in the US since the start of the nuclear program would only fill a football field 3 feet deep. I was involved in a project about 10 years ago where they were testing "vitrifying" nuclear waste, where it was cast into glass blocks to prevent leaching during long-term storage.
If the US would standardize on one or two plant designs, construction, maintenance and overhaul costs would drop dramatically for nuclear power generation.
Like I said earlier in this post, our energy plan needs to be a comprehensive plan that includes nuclear, renewable, fossil and conservation.