Eyecatcher
Gold Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2012
- Messages
- 362
- Location
- Pomona Park Florida
- Tractor
- Yanmar EX450, Ford 8N/2N, Case 580C backhoe, Massey 185
Just finished reading Katahdins LX rear remotes post, and must say I'm impressed. 8/2/12, I posted "Bucket Float on EX450/CL400 unit. J.J. referred me to Cottermacs 5/30/12 post "1026R Loader Problems. Perusing Katahdins post brought up a couple of ideas in my mind. I hope J.J. picks up on this, he seems to be the hydraulic expert.
As in my earlier post, I thought that the problem had been fixed, but it has gotten progressively worse. The last dealer that worked on it said he changed the valve. If he did, the problem has to be somewhere else, and the only think I can think of is relates to the added remote. I'll attempt to update the problem here, maybe someone will cure it.
I purchased the tractor with 50 hrs on it as a demonstrator. I contracted to have front remote installed, by the dealer, for $2k, to power grapple on root rake. When I got the tractor back with the remote installed, after dumping, the bucket tilt "flops" until you hold joystick over to the right, rev the engine, I assume to refill the cylinder and lines, then it has adequate down pressure. After all the hassle with Yanmar America and the 2nd dealer, it worked pretty well after I brought it home, for a few days. Customer Service at Yanmar America, gave me no satisfaction when I reported this. Now, it has regressed to the point that whether you have dumped the bucket or not, when you put it down on the ground, it's limp. I guess in float. I automatically hold right pressure on the stick, and rev the engine until I can see it's charged before I try to use it. It's a big pain in the butt, and it seems to take longer and longer to recharge. Impossible to dig level until recharge, as it will either dig in or float.
The remote that is installed, is not factory. It uses a joystick mounted rocker switch and a double solenoid valve mounted on a fabricated mount attached to the loader mount. Very neat installation, hoses wire tied to existing hoses running up to the front of the loader, and QD's at the solenoids and the front of the loader. When it was new, you could open the grapple and dump the rake at the same time. Now one stops the other. When I got the tractor back, he gave me a bag of parts he had removed. I've often thought about returning the hydraulics to factory and see if the problem is solved. However, removing the liquid filled rear tire is a big job, and I don't know how it was originally configured.
After looking at Katahdins pix, and seeing how he ran the return back into the xmission, I'm thinking now that maybe the installer somehow plumbed the remotes so that the tilt side of the valve dumps into return and doesn't hold the pressure. It would seem to me that the solenoids would have to be plumbed into the pressure beyond port of the loader
valve, then to the oil return. However the return would have to be operable when the solenoid valves were both closed. As I recall from an older power beyond addition to a loader valve, one had to either block or unblock a port inside the valve to enable power beyond. I don't remember which. I wonder if they did this. How would it act if this step were omitted?
The only other things I can think of, is that the linkage adjustment for regenerate is so far our of whack that regenerate is always engaged, or the regenerate function in the loader valve is bad. If in fact the valve was changed, it would seem odd that the same problem would recur.
As in my earlier post, I thought that the problem had been fixed, but it has gotten progressively worse. The last dealer that worked on it said he changed the valve. If he did, the problem has to be somewhere else, and the only think I can think of is relates to the added remote. I'll attempt to update the problem here, maybe someone will cure it.
I purchased the tractor with 50 hrs on it as a demonstrator. I contracted to have front remote installed, by the dealer, for $2k, to power grapple on root rake. When I got the tractor back with the remote installed, after dumping, the bucket tilt "flops" until you hold joystick over to the right, rev the engine, I assume to refill the cylinder and lines, then it has adequate down pressure. After all the hassle with Yanmar America and the 2nd dealer, it worked pretty well after I brought it home, for a few days. Customer Service at Yanmar America, gave me no satisfaction when I reported this. Now, it has regressed to the point that whether you have dumped the bucket or not, when you put it down on the ground, it's limp. I guess in float. I automatically hold right pressure on the stick, and rev the engine until I can see it's charged before I try to use it. It's a big pain in the butt, and it seems to take longer and longer to recharge. Impossible to dig level until recharge, as it will either dig in or float.
The remote that is installed, is not factory. It uses a joystick mounted rocker switch and a double solenoid valve mounted on a fabricated mount attached to the loader mount. Very neat installation, hoses wire tied to existing hoses running up to the front of the loader, and QD's at the solenoids and the front of the loader. When it was new, you could open the grapple and dump the rake at the same time. Now one stops the other. When I got the tractor back, he gave me a bag of parts he had removed. I've often thought about returning the hydraulics to factory and see if the problem is solved. However, removing the liquid filled rear tire is a big job, and I don't know how it was originally configured.
After looking at Katahdins pix, and seeing how he ran the return back into the xmission, I'm thinking now that maybe the installer somehow plumbed the remotes so that the tilt side of the valve dumps into return and doesn't hold the pressure. It would seem to me that the solenoids would have to be plumbed into the pressure beyond port of the loader
valve, then to the oil return. However the return would have to be operable when the solenoid valves were both closed. As I recall from an older power beyond addition to a loader valve, one had to either block or unblock a port inside the valve to enable power beyond. I don't remember which. I wonder if they did this. How would it act if this step were omitted?
The only other things I can think of, is that the linkage adjustment for regenerate is so far our of whack that regenerate is always engaged, or the regenerate function in the loader valve is bad. If in fact the valve was changed, it would seem odd that the same problem would recur.