The issue is that for a given power generator output you need about twice the engine displacement when running at 1800RPM versus 3600RPM. Small engines running at 1800RPM simply do not make a lot of power/torque. And the net result of needing twice the displacement is a lot of cost of mechanical bits tied up for a very infrequently used piece of machinery. For prime power? Sure, the 1800RPM engine wins in greater longevity, reduced noise, reduced fuel consumption, etc, and the extra cost for the larger engine is worth it. But for backup/standby power? The smaller displacement 3600RPM engine wins for cost. And for most residential customers, cost is all that matters. Two solutions to the noise issue associated with 3600RPM engines exist: 1) Better engineered enclosures. 2) Indirect-coupled inverter approach, and thus variable throttle speed. (Result: Engine runs slower when power demand is low) Current inverter technology is not well suited for high power applications (e.g. above 8KW or so), and therefore the two-stage indirect-coupled inverter approach gets unwieldy and expensive. Manufacturers of generators therefore continue to try to engineer quieter enclosures but robust enclosure implementations actually cost quite a bit of money. So, at a given price point, it becomes a tradeoff; for example, do you want full pressure lubrication or a quieter generator? wrooster