Rotary Cutter Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters

   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #11  
Just a thought, but for more or less the same price (~1700$) why not grab a 73" Caroni Flail from Agrisupply. They're way shorter (therefore easier to maneuver), as tough (if not tougher), and safer (is safer a word??).

You're fairly close to the stores in the SE there, and their shipping's not too bad.

JMO.

-J.
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #12  
jinman, I only looked at the tip speed on the models I quoted. Makes sense the lighter cutter has lower tip speed but did surprise me. So now you must check each model of each size for all brands you are looking at. WOW


jgrreed, not sure the flail mower would handle as large as stuff as your rough cut rotary but 73 inches and 7 feet is about 11 inches different so you really then need to compare to a 6 foot cutter. Will agree they are safer. Did not have time to look but one of the models that Agri Supply sells is a rough cut model and think you are correct it is the 73 inch model. It has less cutters on it.
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #13  
jgrreed, not sure the flail mower would handle as large as stuff as your rough cut rotary but 73 inches and 7 feet is about 11 inches different so you really then need to compare to a 6 foot cutter. Will agree they are safer. Did not have time to look but one of the models that Agri Supply sells is a rough cut model and think you are correct it is the 73 inch model. It has less cutters on it.

Ya, it is a rough cut model with half as many hammers (56 vs. 112 I think). I'm told that it'll still do a pretty nice job on the nice grass, especially if I get some 'spoon' style hammers.

I actually just got my Caroni yesterday, and am yet to try it. Maybe tonight?? There's no snow here yet, so I'll maybe take it for a whirl.

I've used my father in law's bush hog and just hate the big swing it does when you turn.

-Jer.
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #14  
Ya, it is a rough cut model with half as many hammers (56 vs. 112 I think). I'm told that it'll still do a pretty nice job on the nice grass, especially if I get some 'spoon' style hammers.

I actually just got my Caroni yesterday, and am yet to try it. Maybe tonight?? There's no snow here yet, so I'll maybe take it for a whirl.

I've used my father in law's bush hog and just hate the big swing it does when you turn.

-Jer.

Be sure you raise the flail cutter before you turn. To get the roller off the ground.
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #16  
I own and operate a commercial mowing business. (We do large acreage tracts and highway right-of-way mowing) I use a mix of 15' batwings and 6'/7' single spindle mounted mowers. So I've got a little experience with them and know a few of the subtle differences.

First off, forget about an "across the board" answer as to the differences between 6', 7', and 8' mowers. They vary considerably from brand to brand, and even from model to model with-in those brands. Blade tip speeds, deck configurations, weights, ect, are not consistant from size to size, or brand to brand. And from experience, blade tip speeds ARE NOT the spec that makes or breaks the performance of any given mower. Blade tip speed is a far over-rated comparator. I've owned several with very high blade speeds that didn't do such a great job. Likewise, I've owned mowers with blade speeds that were rated slower than many, yet performed very well. Don't bet the ranch based strictly on blade tip speed numbers. Also, who's to say what speed is "enough" to do a good job? Is more than enough better? Or does it make ANY difference?

From what I've witnessed over the years, deck design probably has MORE effect on a mowers ability to do a good job than blade speed. In particular, the configuration of the rear of the deck. A mower with the ability to allow cut material to clear from under the mower as it moves along will result in better "quality of cut" in conditions other than simply "mowing a lawn". Clipping tops of relatively short grass is about the only time where blade speed is the ONLY real consideration. Be that the case, you're probably wanting a finish mower in the first place.

The biggest single consideration with deck size is usually weight..... Weight in regards to BALANCE of the tractor when the tractor is carrying that weight. (even when not entirely lifted off the ground) Look at the difference between a 5' and a 6' mower. Then look at the difference between a 6' and a 7'er. No comparison. With the extra foot of width comes an extra foot of LENGTH. I've seen several tractors that toyed with a 6' mower and were overwhelmed with a 7'er. They handled the mower just fine from a horsepower perspective. But they required way too much front ballast to handle the weight in a safe manner.

Now...Take that same tractor that had issues with a 7' single spindle mower and put a HEAVIER (but SHORTER) 8' double spindle mower on it. In MANY (but not ALL) cases, that same tractor will handle the shorter deck with ease.

For comparison, I have an extreme duty 6' mower that weighs in at well over 2100 lb. I have a medium duty 7'er that scales under 1500lbs. The 6'er FEELS MUCH lighter hanging on the 3-point hitch of a couple tractors I frequently use them on. It's all about the balance.

Back to blade speeds.... Most brands, especially the "premium brands", will use different gear boxes specifically designed for the mower they're used on. The gear ratios will be engineered specifically to give blade speed and horsepower requirements to fit the mower at hand. That blade speed is often matched to deck design, as well as the probable eventual use of that mower. (ie a mower designed to cut 4" material probably won't end up being used to cut a lawn, or a light duty "economy" mower shouldn't be used to clear a power line right-of-way)

The engineering that goes into a quality mower is why they cost more and perform better in adverse conditions. They're designed and built to do a job, where many lower priced mowers are products of what I like to call "accidental engineering". They MAY happen to work well at a given chore, or they may not.... Who knows?

Back to the original question; Due to length and balance of weight (distance from rear of tractor to rear tip of mower) an 8' double spindle mower will GENERALLY balance better than a 7' single spindle mower. That reduces the SIZE requirements of the tractor. In many cases, size and HP are relative. The benefit of a shorter mower is less of a power issue and more of a weight handling issue.

Finally, I'm NOT a fan of 7' single spindle mowers. Due to width X length, they tend to scalp FAR WORSE than 6' singles or 8' doubles. Not a issue unless you mow close to the ground, but mow shorter than 3" or so, and you'll be cutting as much dirt as you will grass/weeds if/when mowing on an irregular surface.

JMHO, and worth AT LEAST what you paid for it!
 
Last edited:
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #17  
you'll be cutting as much dirt as you will grass/weeds if/when mowing on an irregular surface.


If I didn't do that, the ground would never get level!

jb
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters #18  
Farmwithjunk, nice post and spot on w/ my much more limited experience.
 
   / Generic question on 7-8 ft. rotary cutters
  • Thread Starter
#19  
Thanks for all the information. That was exactly the type of information what I was looking to get.

froggy
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2009 IC Corporation PB105 School Bus (A51692)
2009 IC...
2015 JOHN DEERE 624K WHEEL LOADER (A51406)
2015 JOHN DEERE...
2011 Cadillac SRX Luxury SUV (A50324)
2011 Cadillac SRX...
(10) 8' Treated Posts (A50515)
(10) 8' Treated...
2011 John Deere 844K Articulated Wheel Loader (A50322)
2011 John Deere...
2015 Jeep Compass SUV (A50324)
2015 Jeep Compass...
 
Top