Brad_Blazer
Veteran Member
Flight school?
http://ejblog.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/far-side-school-for-gifted.jpg
"I agree that flying over the OP's house does not necessarily present an appreciable hazard. That is why their are no regulations against it, that apply here. "
Here is the regulation again- it was already posted.
ァ 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General.
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
(d) Helicopters. Helicopters may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface. In addition, each person operating a helicopter shall comply with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the Administrator.
I love airplanes and have best friends that are pilots. This defense of illegally buzzing houses at less than 100' is really bewildering. That's the type of behavior that results in the curtailment of the freedoms you enjoy. (paraphrasing) "We're only hearing one side of the story, he must be exaggerating - no pilot would do that" "He was landing & it was necessary" yeah .. right. THOSE are the fairy tales totally fabricated by non-witnesses.
Wait a minute- I saw a thread bashing ATV riders for cutting across someones property. I own an ATV! I'd better jump on there and start waving the BS flag!
http://ejblog.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/far-side-school-for-gifted.jpg
"I agree that flying over the OP's house does not necessarily present an appreciable hazard. That is why their are no regulations against it, that apply here. "
Here is the regulation again- it was already posted.
ァ 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General.
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
(d) Helicopters. Helicopters may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface. In addition, each person operating a helicopter shall comply with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the Administrator.
I love airplanes and have best friends that are pilots. This defense of illegally buzzing houses at less than 100' is really bewildering. That's the type of behavior that results in the curtailment of the freedoms you enjoy. (paraphrasing) "We're only hearing one side of the story, he must be exaggerating - no pilot would do that" "He was landing & it was necessary" yeah .. right. THOSE are the fairy tales totally fabricated by non-witnesses.
Wait a minute- I saw a thread bashing ATV riders for cutting across someones property. I own an ATV! I'd better jump on there and start waving the BS flag!