No offense intended... There are two orange tractors in my shop, plus at least 10 color matched attachments, so I kinda like it myself. And, orange is indeed the right color for fall hayrides, etc.
Buying Advice 3700 vs 4400 or L3940
- Thread starter sbohan
- Start date
- Views: 16098
-
- Tags
- kubota l3940
No offense intended... There are two orange tractors in my shop, plus at least 10 color matched attachments, so I kinda like it myself. And, orange is indeed the right color for fall hayrides, etc.
PHILIP8N
Veteran Member
If your stuff can get 4' tall and your cutting with a 6' hog I would not want to get anything smaller than a L3940. For long runs of mowing, the cruise control is very nice on the HST+. I also like the auto-throttle when doing loader work. Looks like we have similar duties, except for the snow blade. Here are a few picks of the L3940. Philip.
Attachments
Yeah I was thinking l4400 because it's a little larger than the 3940 it seems from the spec sheet. Now I'm actually looking at also the mx4700, if I'm going cabless. It's about 3540 price it seems and has a few more cu/in., larger tires, and tiny bit smaller wheelbase/weight. Only 1600 list more than the l4400. NO one here is saying go for the 3700??
DiezNutz
Veteran Member
Nope. Which says something in and of itself, right?
While you're crunching the numbers, don't forget "true cost of ownership", which includes putting a value on your time.
The 'just enough' tractor might look great on paper, but more hours in the seat equals time lost elsewhere plus more tractor wear & tear and maintenance more often.
None taken. Just a little good-natured ribbing for your remarks, you somewhat had to expect it.
TripleR
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 18,084
- Location
- Missouri
- Tractor
- Kubota M8540HDC, L5740HSTC, BX2200, BX2660, John Deere 425&1025R, Case, Massey Ferguson, Ford
Nope. Which says something in and of itself, right?
While you're crunching the numbers, don't forget "true cost of ownership", which includes putting a value on your time.
The 'just enough' tractor might look great on paper, but more hours in the seat equals time lost elsewhere plus more tractor wear & tear and maintenance more often.
I just spent four days on an M8540 and L5030 "trying" to catch up, taking the day off today and back at it tomorrow. Trust me, there is also such a thing as too much seat time.
If working, time is a premium and if retired like me, old age and fatigue eventually becomes a factor. For me, "just enough" tractor is just not going to get it.
Of course I am speaking under ideal situations as I accept that finances often dictate over rule the ideal.
johnrex62
Platinum Member
Guess not. If you think it might be on the small side for you, it probably is. You seems to have a good handle on your work requirements and your gut is probably something you should listen to.
I bought a L3700SU and am very pleased with it, but I only have about 2 acres in high weeds and hope to keep them much lower now. They have been hitting 6-12 feet between mowings because my hired mower is just too busy to come when I need him. So, my dear sweet wife decided I NEEDED a tractor so I could do it myself. (Jealous, are we? Don't blame you :laughing: )
My dealer figured I needed 20-25 horses, so I bought 37. :thumbsup:
My dealer advised the 3700 wasn't enough to comfortably run the 6ft bush hog, to get the 5 with it or go for the 4400. Now I'm debating the mx4700. Anyone have any thoughts on that one? I know the 5100 is not much more, but I really wanted to avoid a turbo for longevity and maintenance.
TripleR
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 18,084
- Location
- Missouri
- Tractor
- Kubota M8540HDC, L5740HSTC, BX2200, BX2660, John Deere 425&1025R, Case, Massey Ferguson, Ford
There was a thread on here not long ago with a debate/discussion on the longevity of turbos. I don't remember if it was settled one way or the other, but to get the power/tractor I wanted I had to go with a turbo and have no concerns.
The MX (4700 or 5100) should handle a 6ft cutter with ease.
As for the turbo, they are very common on diesel heavy equipment and trucks. If they were a serious failure risk in those applications, they probably wouldn't be in such widespread use. I have a 1984 Mack dump truck whose turbo is still functioning OK after 26 years of hard commercial use. What is good for turbo life is the same as for the diesel engine itself: Clean air and regular oil changes. But, you probably already know all that, and if you don't want a turbo on your tractor, the 4700 is for you.
