rjkobbeman
Platinum Member
I'm wondering if the top link was extended farther than normal. That could rotate everything and move the scarifiers farther forward.
I'm wondering if the top link was extended farther than normal. That could rotate everything and move the scarifiers farther forward.
I'm wondering if the top link was extended farther than normal. That could rotate everything and move the scarifiers farther forward.
I'm wondering if the top link was extended farther than normal. That could rotate everything and move the scarifiers farther forward.
that is another possibility. That also would make it so the scarfier teeth didnt damage the tires as they would have been hitting the traed with the flat underside of the replaceable end teeth.
not necessary. I thought the same too but then after looking at his R4 tires, you would have a hard time flattening them since the way that the machine was moving the teeth would hit the front of the tread and just slip off it and hit the next. I am now kinda curious where the teeth broke. Pushing_tin, do you got any pictures of those broken teeth? If i am right those teeth should be 3/4" steel.
This is what the shop told me today. Not sure what to do, if I shorten the top link then the box doesn't touch the ground.
This is what the shop told me today. Not sure what to do, if I shorten the top link then the box doesn't touch the ground.
Well, it sounds like a geometry problem.
Which top link attachment point (hole) did you use on your tractor? That can affect things. On mine, if I use the top hole my cutter's tail wont come off the the ground. If I use the bottom hole it does. That little bit really changes things. (Of course I have an HTL now so the problem is moot.)
Isn't longer lift arms a by-product of the "Pat's Easy Change" setup?
BTW, if the OP adds the Pat's system (or a Quick Hitch), he may need a PTO stub shaft extender for his driven implements.