gladehound
Veteran Member
I was wondering if you could explain this a little more. I don't really understand what is being said.
I'll try...
An uncut lug had no features to help it retain snow on it's surface. It is smooth. Like a slick.
On a hard surface, only the surface of the lug is in contact with the ground making the whole tire perform about as well as a slick. You get a little bite from the edge of each lug, but they get fairly round after you put a few hundred hours on them and don't bit well.
One of the basics of snow tire technology, is that snow gets better traction on snow and ice than the rubber used in most tires. So if you can get snow to stay on the contact surfact of the tires, it will get better traction in hard backed snow and ice.
Grooving does 2 things to help traction:
1. It adds biting edges to the tire (the edges of my groove are also much sharper than the edges of the lug)
2. Probably more importantly, and unlike the wide spaces between lugs that are too big to hold snow well, the small grooves trap snow inside them. Because snow sticks to snow (think of a snow ball or snow man) the snow trapped in the groove provides a strip of snow on the surface of each tire lug and additional snow actually sticks to these strips that are trapped in the grooves and spreads from these "anchor" points at the grooves across the lugs of the tire. On my tires, in the last snow, each 0.2 inch wide groove was causing a 1/2" to 1.5" wide strip of snow to stay on the contact surface of each lug for the length of the groove. If I made the groove longer, the strip of snow would be longer and improve my traction. This is why I said if I did it again i would make the grove longer. A few additional groves would also help.
Did that make sense??