txdon
Super Star Member
Anyone see or read the recent study that determined that eating fried foods had no correlation to heart health. Can someone explain what their definition of healthy is?
HS
Yes, their definition of heart health should be preempted with the words: as compared to.
In the study mentioned 40,757 Spanish adults aged 29 to 69 participated.
None of the study participants were diagnosed with heart disease prior to the beginning of the study. The participants were divided into groups on how much fried food they consumed (between 1992 and 1996) and after 11 years 606 had coronary heart disease events. Notice, this study did not check the participants for heart disease development, only events. (There were 1,135 deaths from all causes.) They found no correlation or difference between using a high or low amount of oil, sunflower oil or olive oil, the results were the same. Both groups had fried foods. Therefore both groups had the same incidence of heart disease that they did not have before the study.
To me this study means:
1. Moderation of oils does not prevent heart disease.
2. Eating fried foods can cause heart disease
I would have like to have seen the study on eating a fat free plant based diet to one eating a fried food diet. Now that would be a comparison.
Edit: There were also 712 definite, possible, or probable coronary heart disease events in addition to the 606 definite coronary heart disease events.
Here is a MI study that compared differently and got different results. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18936332
Last edited: