All the Majors just admitted they don't meet the standards either....
auto-makers-admit-they-cant-meet-pollution-regulations-seek-leniency
auto-makers-admit-they-cant-meet-pollution-regulations-seek-leniency
Hardly the same thing. The other manufacturers are saying that road tests will likely yield higher emissions than the defined dynamometer test. VW implanted a defeat code to deliberately cheat the dyno test.All the Majors just admitted they don't meet the standards either....
auto-makers-admit-they-cant-meet-pollution-regulations-seek-leniency
Not an overly thought out post here and I haven't read any of the articles about this debacle, but a couple of things as the buyer of a 2012 VW TDI:
1) The 2.0 in the Jetta makes 45 MPG is all conditions with zero visible emissions, it's a blast to drive; it's not a bad system and I must believe is cleaner than the generation before that had great efficiency and reliability as well. Compared to a gas engine (2.5L back in 2012 not the new 1.8T) in the same car that gets 30 MPG I struggle to understand how the EPA hasn't stacked the deck against diesels in the US. I'm not condoning cheating but I've never gotten this (we couldn't even buy the previous generation of VW diesels here in Maine, but you can always go buy a V10 or diesel HD truck).
2) Again, without reading any articles, why would plugging in the vehicle be part of any EPA approval testing (such that on detection it ran differently to defeat the test). Plugging in is a part of the self-reporting of an older vehicle during "dumb" emissions testing that doesn't actually involve emissions testing, but why wouldn't new production vehicles just be actually tested on a track/dyno...seems like the EPA has a role here to me....similar to the fact that real world MPG doesn't match EPA on almost all vehicles...oh except diesels that routinely beat the EPA ratings.
1. Governments define the standards.
2. Governments define how vehicles will be tested.
3. Manufacturers design engines to pass the test.
4. Governments develop 'new tests' that 'have been under development for several months' and expect manufacturers to pass the new tests.
What's the problem?
When I looked into this a number of years ago (when I was thinking about getting a diesel), the emission standards were xxxx emissions per gallon of fuel burned. When you get much higher mileage in a diesel, it can be cleaner per mile, but not per gallon, if that makes sense. I think they were trying to figure out how to set standards on all diesels (tractors, trucks, cars, etc) and per gallon was much easier to figure out.
I could be totally wrong, but that is what I recall... (and no, I did not read the whole thread, sorry)
As I've said here before - the air in Los Angeles, in particular, was so bad that everyone was demanding that their elected representatives DO SOMETHING!!!
Thus was born the search for limiting air pollution, the evolution of more rigorous standards, etc.