F150 Powerstroke announced.
- Thread starter tcartwri
- Start date
- Views: 9202
2016 year end truck with other incentives. I got a similar deal on my 2014.
Diamondpilot
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 16,316
- Location
- Daleville, IN
- Tractor
- Jinma 254/284 Ford 861 Powermaster at work
Ram dropped the Cummins in the 1/2 ton for the same reason they will soon drop it for a fiat engine in the HD trucks.
I live 25 miles from the Cummins Head Quarters. I have 2 neighbors who work there, one of which is the #3 man. They are all worried about the relationship with Ram. The are loosing tons of sales with Volvos purchase of Pacar shares and they fear the same with Fiat and Ram.
Think about it. Ram has no need for Cummins in say 3 years. They have proven the in-house Eco Diesel and can do the same in the HD line just like Ford breaking.off from IH
I live 25 miles from the Cummins Head Quarters. I have 2 neighbors who work there, one of which is the #3 man. They are all worried about the relationship with Ram. The are loosing tons of sales with Volvos purchase of Pacar shares and they fear the same with Fiat and Ram.
Think about it. Ram has no need for Cummins in say 3 years. They have proven the in-house Eco Diesel and can do the same in the HD line just like Ford breaking.off from IH
rankrank1
Platinum Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2007
- Messages
- 749
- Location
- SW OH - near Dayton, OH
- Tractor
- 1978 Kubota L285, 1951 Farmall h, 1946 Farmall m, 1950 John Deere A, 1953 Ford NAA Golden Jubilee, 195? Ford 850, 1948 Case DC, 1948 Case SC
I too would be nervous if I was Cummins. FCA is easily big enough to develop diesel engines in-house and keep those added profits to themselves with the engine manufactures they already own controlling interest in.
If the Cummins 5.0 had been a home run design, the decision for Ram to reject it may have at least been difficult to make. Facts are though is it is kinda a fuel hog for what it is so the decision was easy for Ram to make. Had it been winner good Ram would have taken it simply to keep someone else from getting it.
If the Cummins 5.0 had been a home run design, the decision for Ram to reject it may have at least been difficult to make. Facts are though is it is kinda a fuel hog for what it is so the decision was easy for Ram to make. Had it been winner good Ram would have taken it simply to keep someone else from getting it.
coobie
Super Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2004
- Messages
- 6,302
- Location
- S.Michigan
- Tractor
- Kubota RTV 1100c, JD 740,Kioti DK 40 with KL401 loader .
Good job thats a Ton of $$ off..
coobie
Super Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2004
- Messages
- 6,302
- Location
- S.Michigan
- Tractor
- Kubota RTV 1100c, JD 740,Kioti DK 40 with KL401 loader .
Very nice looking truck..
Red Horse
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,155
- Location
- Bolton, MA
- Tractor
- Deere 655ZTrak, Deere 4720 Cab, 400 X LT 155
DP- can you please explain what I highlighted? Volvo purchase of Pacar (Paccar)? Paccar is using in house MAN engines I do believe. And what FIAT or FPT (Fiat Power Technology) engine would take the place of the 6.7 Cummins?
Paystar
Elite Member
Wow, where do you guys get your info? LOL. Volvo hasn't bought into Paccar. Paccar owns Peterbilt, Kenworth and DAF. The Paccar motors are based off of DAF engines.
Volvo owns Mack.
Volkswagen just bought a share of Navistar International, which means joint ventures between International, MAN (who already supplies the main components for the Maxxforce and now N13), Scania and VW.
Volvo owns Mack.
Volkswagen just bought a share of Navistar International, which means joint ventures between International, MAN (who already supplies the main components for the Maxxforce and now N13), Scania and VW.
