JD855guy - that's what happened here as well. Same philosophy.
When I interviewed builders I had specific questions, one of which is "How often will you be at the site?" This one's answer was once a week. Well, that didn't happen. He also told me that it would be built according to code, but I found out later he didn't know what the codes were. :banghead: A builder that doesn't know what the codes are???? Isn't the builder's purpose to be sure the subs do what they are supposed to do? So I pointed out to the builder where codes were not being followed. Well - - now you have a sub you've been working with for years saying they meet code and a homeowner (who typically does not know construction or codes) saying they don't meet code. Who would you believe? Once I realized he didn't know the codes and what the subs were telling him, I got out the code references and sent them to the builder. I also got my electrical code book out and showed it to the (2nd) foreman in front of the electrician.
The 1st foreman got caught ordering much more material than needed for the house, returning the excess and pocketing the refund.
The builder also told me much later that when they put the floor outlet in the middle of the slab that the floor guy wouldn't do it right. So, you'd think the builder would be there to make sure it was done right. Nope, we now have a chiseled piece of concrete in the middle of a stained and polished slab. We'll be putting a couch over it.
Building this house could have gone so much smoother and quicker. The builder did suggest changes during construction that really ended up enhancing the house and we accepted and his price for the changes which was very reasonable and could have been much higher. The house came in really close to the budget we'd allocated. We've gotten very favorable comments on what the inside of the house looks like. The outside is intentionally rather plain with Hardie Plank all around and steel columns at the porches. If we'd not been here watching the construction every day we'd have a different opinion, but we know what's under the paint.
I'll get a picture of the finished storm room and get it posted later. In the meantime, a few thoughts on how this went down:
- I'm not happy with the construction. It does not meet the drawings, specs, codes you name it, it doesn't meet it. I also don't like paying twice for a door because the builder made a mistake. However, it does look good now. The FEMA specs seem to be for an EF5 storm and we're on the edge of the tornado belt and far enough from the coast that Cat 2 hurricanes should be the strongest we should see. There is more rebar in the block walls than required by FEMA. The concrete ceiling was mixed by on-site mixer and lifted in-place in 5 gal buckets and I believe it to have a higher strength than required by FEMA. There are no cracks in the ceiling concrete. I did talk to a structural engineer (via phone) about all these problems and he feels it will be ok. The one concern I do have is how well the one side of the door is anchored in the wall - no answer on that. The door is on an interior wall facing away from the direction the storms come from. Any missiles the storm would throw would have to come thru 2 other walls to get to the door. So I think we'll be ok, just not as ok as following the plans would have made it.