Sigarms
Super Member
Sig said something about it and I kind of ran with it, sorry for the derail..
The fact is you ran with it, so you must see some kind of an analogy in your comparisons...
When I see stats and how the news prints news stories, I do see a lot of common ground between dog attacks and gun shootings. If you read one of the links I provided, I can't be the only one scratching my head over the comment "And the ASPCA issued a statement that the media has repeatedly told them that they have no interest in reporting attacks involving non-pit-bull-type dogs."
Reality - a lab or some heinz 57 dog kills a kid, eh, a dog kills which can happen all the time, and in general, no interest. BUT, if a pit bull kills, it will get people more interested in reading about it.
Perhaps another story the news calls the dog a pit bull, but when you actually see the dog, it's more of a lab looking dog, but because it's shorter than a normal lab, it's got to be a pit mix, but at that point, they'll just call it a pit bull (who really cares what the actual breed is?)
Reality - A black kid shoots another black kid with a 38 snubby (or a couple of other black kids), it makes local headlines in the obits and perhaps a paragraph in the police section and maybe a side bar on the internet. Kids are killing kids every day with small guns, no one really cares. However, a guy takes a AR-15 out and shoots someone (or a couple of other people) and it WILL make the headlines because it's a BLACK EVIL LOOKING RIFLE.
Another story the paper claims that the shooter used a AR15 type rifle, but when you see a picture of the actual gun, turns out the gun was a black ruger .22LR and wasn't even a centerfire rifle (although most likely half the population in the US couldn't tell you the difference between a centerfire or a rimfire). But who really cares what kind of gun it was? It was still a gun that killed, what difference does it matter?
Go figure huh?
The reality is ANY dog that has size and strength and hurt people, particularly given the envrionment the dogs are raised in.
You don't really need a license to have dogs OR kids, but you do need some kind of license to own a firearm. Why? Keep in mind, I could be arguing the fact that you shouldn't need a license to own a firearm
Last edited: