Pretty sure it was a different reason.
I hear you, but that wasn't it.
No, the Federal RFQ was very clear about speeds, and Starlink did not meet the speeds. I followed that whole process quite closely because we are also in an area with no services besides satellite. I was hoping one of the local fiber companies might bid on our road, but in the end, there were no bids.
Our local telco quoted us $14k to run fiber, which granted was cheaper than I could have run it, but the monthly charge was for $500/100Mbit/s. "Commercial service rates only." A micro cell tower capable of long distance microwave would have run us $20-$25k, for a monthly cost of $250 for 300Mbit/s service. Most of my neighbors have shelled out for those services.
Starlink did selectively bid on areas across the country for service where they apparently believed that they would have less competition. The map of the proposed service areas looked like some lot layouts in some crazy newspaper land lottery development. It had no correlation to the Starlink cells, just where others weren't proposing services. There were vacant lots in the largest city around here that had Starlink bids on them, because nobody else was bidding on it.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda...
I just hope that the service keeps functioning, or we will have to build that micro tower.
All the best,
Peter