100+ hp tractor suggestions

[sandman2234]

I came across a good deal on a 15' batwing, but really didn't need it. I planned to pull it with the JD 2555 but speeds really weren't my concern, so I may have had to run slower than I wanted to make it pull it in deep grass. I sold the mower before I ever got it home, so I don't know if I made a mistake or not, buying it for a 70 hp tractor.
Should have kept it, as it would be great for that Ford 7710.
David from jax

 

[Slippy]

Robert: the 2940 does have air. Not sure of the cab brand. Can find that out.

 

[Slippy]

Here are some pictures of the 2940. Any thoughts from anyone?

 

[Slippy]

Here are some pictures of the 4440. Thoughts?

 

[Farmwithjunk]

The 2940's cab isn't going to be very quiet compared to the 4440. Those older style cabs would amplify noise. Still looks to be a fairly decent tractor.

The 4440 and the hydrostatic front drive axle would be good for what you have in mind. That front axle isn't the best set-up for hard pulling drawbar loads, but they offer good control in mud and slick conditions. Also, they don't have the later "positive castor steering" of the 50 series MFWDs. Turning radius isn't quite as sharp as later models. The 4440 is one of the best tractors ever built by ANY brand. The 466 cu. in. engine is a torquer. They have a brilliant reputation. Is it a powershift or quadrange? In any event, it's common to see a 4440 sell well over $20,000 in average condition. The Soundgaurd cab was a giant breakthrough in quiet comfort. (My 4250 had the SG cab and I LOVED it) All things being equal, I'd rather own the 4440.

 

[Robert_in_NY]

The cab on the 2940 looks like a Hiniker which was one of the best at the time but that isn't saying much. They are noisy and you will want ear plugs while you operate it.

I am not too fond of the Soundgard cab design but it is much nicer then the Hiniker and if you plan on spending long hours during the warm season in this tractor find one that has a good, comfortable cab as you will thank yourself every time you use it.

 

[mlauk]

Slippy, I would reconsider a 2WD 100 HP tractor. They are much more available in the price range you are trying to stay in. Also, you would be amazed how difficult it is to get a large 2WD tractor stuck in the mud compared to a compact tractor. You would be better off getting a 2WD with a locking differential rather than 4WD.

 

[Slippy]

You know, the more I think about this, a 2wd probably would work. There are only occassions when I use the MFWD now with my 60hp tractor because I like to keep as much power on the pto as possible. May have to modify my search.

 

[Turbys_1700]

Slippy, I would reconsider a 2WD 100 HP tractor. They are much more available in the price range you are trying to stay in. Also, you would be amazed how difficult it is to get a large 2WD tractor stuck in the mud compared to a compact tractor. You would be better off getting a 2WD with a locking differential rather than 4WD.

I gotta agree on this one too Slippy. My dad and I use the 8050 for hogging and get along just fine. It's a great machine and works great for us. Keep us informed on your decision and good luck.

Just on a side note: Isn't it amazing how much cheap horsepower you can get in some of these older units. Compared to our little 4WD compacts they are a steal.

 

[Slippy]

Ok, now things have gotten real difficult. There are tons of tractors out there in the 100+ pto hp in 2wd. I think it would be best to stay with a 6 cyl. and should have ROPS or cab. Is there some place to get specs on tractors such as hp, transmission features, and cyl? What is the difference between a power shift and quadrange?