3120 gets no respect

   / 3120 gets no respect #41  
I think this is exactly right. To me, the 3120 represents a nice chance to move into a mid frame machine for those who might be on the fence about the cost of one, but have a need for a machine that size. My only problem with the machine is that JD has positioned it too close in cost to the more powerful 3320. The difference is not great, but notable. Now that the 3203 is on the scene I think it will be harder to sell the 3120 to some people looking at that priced machine. I personally would take a 3120 everyday v a 3203, but some people will go with a little more power and a more sparsely equipped machine.

John M
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #42  
I think this is exactly right. To me, the 3120 represents a nice chance to move into a mid frame machine for those who might be on the fence about the cost of one, but have a need for a machine that size. My only problem with the machine is that JD has positioned it too close in cost to the more powerful 3320. The difference is not great, but notable. Now that the 3203 is on the scene I think it will be harder to sell the 3120 to some people looking at that priced machine. I personally would take a 3120 everyday v a 3203, but some people will go with a little more power and a more sparsely equipped machine.

John M
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #43  
Here’s my “free” advice to John Deere Marketing.

Simplify your product offerings in the 3X20’s by:

1. Dropping the 3320 and the 3520 all together.
2. Offering only the 3120 and the 3720.
3. Setting-up an option for the 3120 for a turbo that can be field installed by the dealer or end-user. The turbo option would give the same output as the current 3520 and give the end user the ability to increase their HP and torque if they find the 3120 lacking.
4. Making the 3203 a tractor for export only or have Home Depot set-up an Agriculture Division and sell it for a value price of $9999.99 without attachments.

The logic:

The need for higher HP and torque is largely based on how much of a need there will be for “ground engaging equipment” type of attachments.

Example:

Model; Ground Engaging Equipment Usage
3120; Light
3120 w/ turbo (3520); Medium
3720; Heavy

It doesn’t mean the same ground engaging equipment can’t be used on each of the tractors listed. The lower rated ones may take more passes to accomplish what the higher rated ones can do in one pass.

For PTO driven attachments, yes the higher HP will help. It doesn’t mean the attachments won’t work, it means if you’re running it at maximum capacity it may take more time with the lower rated tractor.

For hydraulic based attachments, such as FEL or BH, there should be no differences between models since all the models have the same hydraulic flow and pressure ratings.

It’s a “win-win” for everyone:

The dealer only needs to stock the 3120 and 3720. They can also increase their revenue by charging to install the add-on turbo option for the 3120 since it will not be a factory installed option.

The customer doesn’t have to worry if the 3120 is just right or not. If after receiving the tractor they need more HP and torque for their application, the turbo upgrade option is available for a price.

(Disclaimer: I have no marketing background, use this “free” advice at your own risk. However if it works, track me down for the consulting fee.)
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #44  
Here’s my “free” advice to John Deere Marketing.

Simplify your product offerings in the 3X20’s by:

1. Dropping the 3320 and the 3520 all together.
2. Offering only the 3120 and the 3720.
3. Setting-up an option for the 3120 for a turbo that can be field installed by the dealer or end-user. The turbo option would give the same output as the current 3520 and give the end user the ability to increase their HP and torque if they find the 3120 lacking.
4. Making the 3203 a tractor for export only or have Home Depot set-up an Agriculture Division and sell it for a value price of $9999.99 without attachments.

The logic:

The need for higher HP and torque is largely based on how much of a need there will be for “ground engaging equipment” type of attachments.

Example:

Model; Ground Engaging Equipment Usage
3120; Light
3120 w/ turbo (3520); Medium
3720; Heavy

It doesn’t mean the same ground engaging equipment can’t be used on each of the tractors listed. The lower rated ones may take more passes to accomplish what the higher rated ones can do in one pass.

For PTO driven attachments, yes the higher HP will help. It doesn’t mean the attachments won’t work, it means if you’re running it at maximum capacity it may take more time with the lower rated tractor.

For hydraulic based attachments, such as FEL or BH, there should be no differences between models since all the models have the same hydraulic flow and pressure ratings.

It’s a “win-win” for everyone:

The dealer only needs to stock the 3120 and 3720. They can also increase their revenue by charging to install the add-on turbo option for the 3120 since it will not be a factory installed option.

The customer doesn’t have to worry if the 3120 is just right or not. If after receiving the tractor they need more HP and torque for their application, the turbo upgrade option is available for a price.

(Disclaimer: I have no marketing background, use this “free” advice at your own risk. However if it works, track me down for the consulting fee.)
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #45  
Your 'handle' says it all. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Choices is what it's all about, along with market share (at least the way I see it, and am sure Deere & Co. isn't flying blind here either). /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Now, what size Deere do you have? Any pics?
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #46  
Your 'handle' says it all. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Choices is what it's all about, along with market share (at least the way I see it, and am sure Deere & Co. isn't flying blind here either). /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Now, what size Deere do you have? Any pics?
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #47  
The best JD tractor out, the 3120. Here's some recent action photos. I keep telling it that it's not suppose to be able to do all this, but, it won't listen to me.

157583725_69da784362_o.jpg


157583724_ac5a14f9e7_o.jpg
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #48  
The best JD tractor out, the 3120. Here's some recent action photos. I keep telling it that it's not suppose to be able to do all this, but, it won't listen to me.

157583725_69da784362_o.jpg


157583724_ac5a14f9e7_o.jpg
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #49  
I really like that tractor!! It is really nice. Can I have your backhoe???

John M
 
   / 3120 gets no respect #50  
I really like that tractor!! It is really nice. Can I have your backhoe???

John M
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

1268 (A50490)
1268 (A50490)
2014 CATERPILLAR 277D SKID STEER LOADER (A51222)
2014 CATERPILLAR...
2007 Chevrolet Impala Sedan (A48082)
2007 Chevrolet...
UNUSED Safety Traffic Cones (A50860)
UNUSED Safety...
American Sanders Super 7R Electric Wood Floor Edger (A49461)
American Sanders...
Set of Ag R4 Wheels and Tires (A51039)
Set of Ag R4...
 
Top