Too many of you men are bashing defed...
don't worry Roy, i can take it
He bought a tractor he's not used to and maybe being a bit cautious.
apparently not cautious enough!
Plus, being a used 4300, it's likely got a few flaws here and there. I saw the pictures of it (on Machinefinder.com) before he bought it. Decent tractor, but not a jewel. However, the 4300 and such, although fine tractors (one of Deere's best efforts, IMHO), it's not a farm tractor. My guess is the market was local landscapers, rental companies and "gentlemen farmers" with little "in the woods" work expected. Hence, the exposed turn signals and other such things. One long time criticism was the vunerable underside (I read about this when those tractors were current product) which lead to a number of ripped hydraulic hoses, wiring and eventually led to the underamor kit to protect the "belly of the beast".
i just expect any tractor to be able to handle simple tasks, like driving on dirt. i wasn't doing anything that a landscaper wouldn't do. sure, if i was slamming the thing around on a pile of rocks things would get tore up. and imagine the things ppl do who rent equipment!