rankrank1
Platinum Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2007
- Messages
- 749
- Location
- SW OH - near Dayton, OH
- Tractor
- 1978 Kubota L285, 1951 Farmall h, 1946 Farmall m, 1950 John Deere A, 1953 Ford NAA Golden Jubilee, 195? Ford 850, 1948 Case DC, 1948 Case SC
What didn't you like about the Ram power Train? Did it seem like less power?
It has been a few months ago that I drove the Ram 2500, but it seemed more subdued and the Ram 6.4 did not have that desirable sound at all. I think Ford has hit the nail on the head with their revised 2017 tranny for the gasser (different 1st gear ratio and 6th gear ratio)and the motor enhancements where the torque comes on sooner in the 6.2 powerband will now make it be a motor that works well with the 3.73 ratio. Good towing power when towing and decent mpg for a F250 with the 3.73 when running empty. Prior to the 2017 model the Ford owner 6.2 experts were claiming get the 4.30 rear end ratio due to the power being higher in the power band and the tranny ratios were different too. Course the 4.30 came with an empty mpg penalty but that was a price to live with to get something that worked well together. If only I did not find both the ride and handling so utterly terrible in that 2017 F250...
Back to the 2016 Ram: It felt slow and heavy compared to the 2016 Ram 1500 8 speed Hemi 5.7 we drove the same day just for giggles. In fairness it is much heavier but I was not expecting the slowness factor. I really liked that 8 speed in that Ram 1500 5.7 Hemi - their shifts were almost undetectable. Sadly, No way a Ram 1500 can handle my dump trailer legally with their puny payload capacity. I have my 2003 GMC 1500 enhanced with HD tires and helper springs to borderline do this and it actually does pretty well for an ole 4 speed auto tranny and my sorta rare to be found in a 1500series 4.10 rear end ratio really helps me here. if Ram could come up with a HD variant of that wonderful 8 speed tranny to put in the 2500 series then they would certainly have a winner no doubt with either the base 5.7 or the 6.4 in a 2500. The 2016 Ram rode pretty darned good for a 2500 series truck in my opinion. I could easily live with that ride quality and it handled just fine and more importantly the wife could live with it too. She would beat me with a baseball bat if I brought that lousy Ford F250 ride home and that undesirable steering feeling would have been a deal breaker anyway even with a better ride. The Ram sat up in the air the highest of all the trucks I have driven and I did not necessarily care for that. Sadly the Ram HD tranny that Ram currently uses is more suited for the Cummins powerband - so in my opinion some performance will always be missing with the Ram gasser. If you read a lot of the mag rag shootouts the venerable GM 6.0 actually does quite well against the competition with the dated 6.0 simply because it works so well with their tranny and computer programming. Sadly a GM is out as I no longer comfortably fit in their new body style cabs but the GM ride in older 2500 units I hade ridden in would have been fine for me. as would the handling.
For now my current 2003 GMC 1500 Ext cab with 8 ft bed, 4x4, 5.3, 4 speed auto tranny, and 4.10 rear axle ratio only has 104k miles on it so it is far from worn out and has been paid for well over a decade. Until I find something that substantially outperforms it then I will simply keep what I have. I have driven the new F150 with the 5.0 as well as the Hemi 5.7 and really liked them both but not $45K better than what I have. Sadly if I want another ext cab with an 8 foot bed in a 1500 series then it will have to be either a Ford or a Toyota Tundra as they currently are only manufacturers who still make one in a 1500. At some point, I probably should drive a MAX tow package F150 with the 3.5 eco-boost. Had sorta been waiting for the new 10 speed tranny to arrive which has happened this year.
If I am going to part with $45k of my hard earned money then I am not willing to settle for less than desired in any of my performance based categories and I absolutely do not want a diesel. Otherwise that money can get diverted to some investments that maybe with a little luck will help me retire a year or two sooner than if spent on a truck.