Well if you want a new tractor you don't have much of a choice, you get what you get. Technology and all. I'm in the Telecommunications business, for 35 years now, seen lots of changes. You either embrace the changes or you are out of a job, simple as that. I know that's a little off course with the original post but it still applies.
Welcome to TBN, and good luck with the tractor hunting.... that can be almost a much fun as seat time once you get there.
If you want to remain a worker bee in tech, or a franchised equipment dealer, then you don't have much choice but to drink the Koolaid of the Month, when it comes to technology.
Big corporate farms would often want to cycle through Ag equipment fast, for a few reasons. Accounting would probably be one of the top priorities.
While some do operate large farms, a lot of TBN'ers fall into the small/hobby farm category.
In the small/hobby category, there are whole range of types of tractor owners. Some have literally never lifted a wrench, others are on the 10'th or 50'th (successful
If you want to (or learn how to) get your hands dirty, there can be advantges beyond just initial cost to going with an older piece of equipment. Reliability and repair costs being 2 big ones.
Where I get irritated (sometimes severely) with new technology is when primary functions are impaired, esp. coupled with severely inflated repair costs. In the commercial world, zero downtime would be ideal - a lot of new equipment tech falls down in that area.
We went through this cycle (still are) with light-duty pickup trucks. How many 7.3L or Cummins 12v owners would have moved on to the Latest and Greatest, if they new how the story would unfold ?
Commercial OTR trucking is going through this painful cycle now. Bad enough, that I've seen brokers inviting O/O's to come in with 10+ y/o trucks - if they pass the company tech inspection, they're hired.
I suspect that Ag equipment will not be immune from similar pain.
Telecomm. Newer is better, right ?
Mot developed a cell phone a few years back, for 3'rd world markets. Just a basic numeric phone, but it absolutely killed on battery life. Intended markets had little or nothing for reliable grid power.
While I started texting on the original blackberry (and still text today), I prefer voice for personal communication. Every phone I've had here has had progressively worse battery life - and that's with me picking towards the top of the litter, in terms of battery performance. I'd buy that Mot 3'rd World phone in a heartbeat, if I could. The only problem I could see is remembering where I put it's charger 3 months ago !
I can call a major Canadian college (ironically their Technical campus) and none of the "modern" digital products I've tried can select a 4 digit extension. The same phones at my end work fine with other company's phone systems. In other words, the college's Latest and Greatest PBX can't reliably process DTMF tones. I guess I expect too much, DTMF has only been around since what, the 1950's ?
New tech can perform impressively under certain conditions. If those specifics matter enough, then the Latest and Greatest can be the best choice.
A resource like TBN can help you decide if Olde Tek is a good fit for your requirements/budget.
Rgds, D.