<font color="blue"> we've had posters that have used small backhoes to do much more than Bob would even consider trying to do </font>
Rodger, KiotiJohn is very correct about this statement. The reason he is correct is because I don't have time to waste. I think John's statement, which also goes along with Henro's line of thought, and my posts, does ring through that I would rather get the right tool for the job than waste my time, something that I have too little of.
So to really look at the whole concept of small backhoes. I know what can be done. But I also know what can be done in a REASONABLE amount of time. I built a playhouse for my daughter, I didn't use an 8-oz finish hammer to frame the rafters. I cleared an industrial field of debris, I didn't use my Cub Cadet to drag a mini-landscape rake. My point is not that I need to use the biggest tool, but that I won't waste time using the wrong tool. I don't begrudge anyone who actually has uses for their tiny hoes, I just find that they are not TIME effective or COST effective for many people. Yes, they will do the job. But I am a busy man, I don't have enough time to spend with my wife and child, and while I love to play on the tractors, I can't live on them for endless hours doing tasks that could have, should have, been done in hours rather than days.
Again, you can dig a ditch and bury an electric cable with a back hoe, it will take about a half hour to do the work that I did in 4 minutes with a subsoiler, 2 hose clamps, and a pipe. And then you will spend a lot more time repairing your lawn.
You can dig a foundation for a house with a small hoe, but it would take WEEKS instead of a day or two.
I don't have the rocks that the boys up in New England contend with, and I don't pop out stumps, and I don't have the time to waste with a small hoe. Even if it CAN do the job, it cannot do it EFFECTIVELY and EFFICIENTLY enough to satisfy me.
JMHO with an added $0.02 to boot.