Buying Advice Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires

   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #31  
Filled tires are great to aid stability to a tractor...not much for traction though (although I'm sure filled tires to add to traction).

Filled tires on my 8N are night and day. Makes a BIG difference in traction. On plow day, impressed many folks with larger JD's, AC's, and Cases. Philip.

Y'know...after thinking about it, I don't think I've ever used a tractor that didn't have filled tires (with the possible exception of an old Farmall my father owned many years ago).
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #32  
Y'know...after thinking about it, I don't think I've ever used a tractor that didn't have filled tires (with the possible exception of an old Farmall my father owned many years ago).

We have an old Case 995 on which we never filled the tires and our Ford 600 with loaded tires will out pull it. We use the Case for bush hogging exclusively and until we cleared all the Locust trees out we had to plug them about every day, so filled tires wouldn't work.

We have 2 Ford 600's and a NAA, fluid really makes a difference in traction as we have run them with and without.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #33  
My own experience and everything I have read is not to fill the tires, or at least not fill them like they used to. Now this is with farm tractors with AG tires, I don't know how compacts with R-4 tires are affected. I also have 2 tractors at a friends farm that are very close in set-up and weight that I run on a regular basis(2 of many I have run filled and unfilled over the years). The only major difference is one has filled tires the other has cast weight. The cast weight tractor pulls better, and rides much nicer. Most tire MFG and at least Deere don't recommend filling tires anymore. I know in draft applications the tires work much better unfilled. Unfilled tires will flex more and grip the ground better. I don't know if it would make a difference in loader work. As the loader fills the rear in most cases will get lighter. Where in draft (plowing) the rear gets pulled down.

You also don't have to fill the tires fully, you could only fill say 30%-40% and this would lower the weight and still allow some flex.

In cooler weather filled tires seem to ride really rough and take longer to "warm up" and start flexing.

If I could avoid it I would never again fill tires on any of my own equipment. The problem with compact tractors is it seems hard to add as much weight as needed.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #34  
My own experience and everything I have read is not to fill the tires, or at least not fill them like they used to. Now this is with farm tractors with AG tires, I don't know how compacts with R-4 tires are affected. I also have 2 tractors at a friends farm that are very close in set-up and weight that I run on a regular basis(2 of many I have run filled and unfilled over the years). The only major difference is one has filled tires the other has cast weight. The cast weight tractor pulls better, and rides much nicer. Most tire MFG and at least Deere don't recommend filling tires anymore. I know in draft applications the tires work much better unfilled. Unfilled tires will flex more and grip the ground better. I don't know if it would make a difference in loader work. As the loader fills the rear in most cases will get lighter. Where in draft (plowing) the rear gets pulled down.

You also don't have to fill the tires fully, you could only fill say 30%-40% and this would lower the weight and still allow some flex.

In cooler weather filled tires seem to ride really rough and take longer to "warm up" and start flexing.

If I could avoid it I would never again fill tires on any of my own equipment. The problem with compact tractors is it seems hard to add as much weight as needed.

Interesting, I put wheel weights on my BX and have considered doing so on a couple of our newer tractors. In my area, farmers often go with filled tires and weights. I need to check with the family that farms our land as they use 7000&8000 Series John Deeres.

Some of us are victims of "we have always done it this way".
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #35  
The model # is LM8244. But remember that it is Canadan made. My dealer had to contact a dealer in Canada. With you living that close you shouldn't have a problem finding one. Me being in Kansas made it a little tuffer. What I liked about this box is the way you put the rod in your 3pt lower links then you can just leave it there. When you want to us your ballast box you back up to it let the rod go under the hooks and lift. No getting off the tractor to hookup top link or anything and the same with unhooking just back it where you want it,drop it and drive away. I don't know the closest Canadan dealer to you but you might find a box around you sense you live that close.

P/S I you go to kubota on this site and search Ballast LM8244 Ballast box
you can see where I first seen it.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires
  • Thread Starter
#36  
Philip8N:

That really is an awesome job with the ballast box.

You now need to paint (even with temporary paint) a black jack-o-lantern face on that thing and put it out in front of your house for Halloween.

That's what I'd be doing.


John
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #37  
My own experience and everything I have read is not to fill the tires, or at least not fill them like they used to. Now this is with farm tractors with AG tires, I don't know how compacts with R-4 tires are affected. I also have 2 tractors at a friends farm that are very close in set-up and weight that I run on a regular basis(2 of many I have run filled and unfilled over the years). The only major difference is one has filled tires the other has cast weight. The cast weight tractor pulls better, and rides much nicer. Most tire MFG and at least Deere don't recommend filling tires anymore. I know in draft applications the tires work much better unfilled. Unfilled tires will flex more and grip the ground better. I don't know if it would make a difference in loader work. As the loader fills the rear in most cases will get lighter. Where in draft (plowing) the rear gets pulled down.

You also don't have to fill the tires fully, you could only fill say 30%-40% and this would lower the weight and still allow some flex.

In cooler weather filled tires seem to ride really rough and take longer to "warm up" and start flexing.

If I could avoid it I would never again fill tires on any of my own equipment. The problem with compact tractors is it seems hard to add as much weight as needed.

I don't know that I would agree with all this. Tires should be filled to about 75% of their volume, at that level the tire still has plenty of room to flex and conform to the terrain. Air pressure is more of a factor in this than fluid vs non-fluid filled tires. We have a 2550 JD that is used almost entirely for field work, rear tires filled, cast rear wheels (rack and pinion), and wheel weights. This is all in recommendation of the manual, and the desired amount of slip is achieved by adjusting tire pressure. The traction is so great that when moldboard plowing you can actually lift the front tires off the ground when you hit a tough spot (with 1100lbs of weight on the front also). I personally don't know how much better traction you could need or want, and this is with just 2wd. So loading tires does work, I know my little NAA and Kubota would be worthless without loaded tires.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #38  
Sample arithmetic on ballast box.
Cat 1 tractor, ~6ft wheelbase, loader bucket center 4ft ahead of front axle, 3pt lift arms ~27 inches.
Quick "back o' the pay envelope" arithmetic shows that every pound of ballast box weight relieves the front axle load 3/8 of a pound (27/72).

So, HOW MUCH are you going to put in there to get anything significant off the (fragile) front axle ?

The 4ft dimension is only useful for figuring the front axle load wrt the loader's load and of course the front end of the tractor that it carries.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #39  
Sample arithmetic on ballast box.
Cat 1 tractor, ~6ft wheelbase, loader bucket center 4ft ahead of front axle, 3pt lift arms ~27 inches.
Quick "back o' the pay envelope" arithmetic shows that every pound of ballast box weight relieves the front axle load 3/8 of a pound (27/72).

So, HOW MUCH are you going to put in there to get anything significant off the (fragile) front axle ?

The 4ft dimension is only useful for figuring the front axle load wrt the loader's load and of course the front end of the tractor that it carries.

Well, I'm sure your numbers are different for my tractor... buy my ballast box weighs 1800 pounds. Using your numbers, that would remove 675 pounds off of my front end. But more importantly, it prevents my rear end from coming off of the ground when I am picking up a big load or ripping trees out of the ground. Keeping the rear end on the ground is the biggest benefit in my eyes.
 
   / Ballast Box vs Wheel Weights vs Filled Tires #40  
On a sample CUT the R1 tires have about 70% of the ballast capacity of the R4,
35 vs 50 gallons at the 75% fill level.

280 vs 400 lbs of water, 410 vs 585 of RimGuard at 11.7 lb per gallon, same ratio for ww fluid, though I understand that to be slightly lower density than water.

Arguably with filled R4s you have more weight to the ground on a bigger footprint, e.g. more traction with less compaction (lower pressure) - as I said, arguably.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Morooka MST 660VD Tracked Dump Truck  Only 30 Hours (A51039)
Morooka MST 660VD...
New Lewis Brothers MFG DB2 Poultry Housekeeper (A51039)
New Lewis Brothers...
2015 JEEP PATRIOT (A51406)
2015 JEEP PATRIOT...
Payment Terms (MUST READ) (A50775)
Payment Terms...
2014 PJ 24+6 T/A GOOSENECK (A50854)
2014 PJ 24+6 T/A...
2008 Ford F-250 Reading Service Truck (A50323)
2008 Ford F-250...
 
Top