Eisenhower was the sort of commander in chief you could trust, he certainly had a fine military record, but from what I've read, he had trouble keeping his pants up while he was married. This is old history, my point is that personal ethics don't necessarily correspond to ability as commander in chief. I don't think Gore has the obvious sort of ethical problems that Clinton does,and maybe his military experience will help him in the job. Gore's proposed budget has more money in it for the military than Bush's which should allow him to do more.
Bush, the person, seems like a reasonable candidate for the job, but I don't like his policies. I think he's always looking out for his big supporters. This means big tax cuts, that mostly benefit the rich, and oil policies that primarily benefit oil companies. This last week was a perfect example. Consumers of oil are the winners while Bush and the oil companies are left complaining that it was a campaign trick.
Etc, etc, I'm running out of steam. I'd rather read about tractors than write about politics anyway.