N80 said:
When he got on the motorcycle!
I'm just kidding...sort of. I've ridden dirt bikes recreationally and I've mountain biked a lot. But riding a motorcycle or a bike with cars just always seemed too risky for me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that motorcycles are not a legitimate form of transportation. I have nothing against them or anyone who rides them. But the reality of the physics that exists on the American highway system is such that the motorcycle is simply underweight and underprotected.
I've been an advocate of "individual responsibility" for as long as I've known what that means. Some people have this sense of entitlement, believing they should be able to do whatever they wish, but when something goes terribly wrong, someone else should have stepped up and "saved them". There's a certain percentage of motorcyclists who seem to feel this way, just as there is with any group, culture, society, race, creed, gender, or political interest. (Not singling ANYONE out. Speaking in broad general terms here)
I ride a bike. I hold NO ONE else responsible for the outcome, other than an individual who exersizes negligence or disregard for the law that causes harm to me, should I be involved in an accident. It's not the Federal or State Governments responsibility to prevent me from harm beyond enforcing laws that protect EVERYONE.
I'd expect every REASONABLE effort be taken to create a safe path for me to ride, but it would seem UNREASONABLE to expect millions to be spent to protect so small of a portion of the motoring public.
Now for the controversial part that flies in the face of some of what I've already said....
As a long-time rider, I support laws REQUIRING helmets. I support laws requiring rider training. I support laws requiring bikes to "fit in" with the mainstream. (ie noise limits) It's up to the riders to create and maintain a good public image. We have to realize we ARE "different". We have to make consessions. We have to realize that riding IS dangerous, and that won't ever change.