Re: Chinese Tractors Aren\'t Worth the Risk
marrt-
<font color=blue>Well, if I wrote my post to provoke a confrontation and “stir the pot,” I must be very happy right now as I certainly would have accomplished that goal.</font color=blue>
Yes. I bet you are quite pleased with yourself - although I suspect the direction is a bit different than you initially anticipated.
<font color=blue>If you thought my comments were disingenuous and designed to provoke a response….then why respond? You would be giving me what I apparently wanted. </font color=blue>
I did not respond for your pleasure or to "give you what you want" but:
1) To point out to others who were not aware of your pattern of behavior that seems to be developing,
2) To defend my points as to your reply.
<font color=blue>Better to keep quite and frustrate me.</font color=blue>
I think you were wanting to "start something" with the Chinese tractor owners and perhaps weren't expecting someone to "call your bluff." No, I have a feeling I might be "frustrating" you just fine by "calling it as I see it." And by your condescending tone, sounds to me like you would prefer me to be "quiet".
<font color=blue>I have found that people who come on the site strictly to make an accusation and start an argument a) don’t usually register and post a wide variety of comments </font color=blue>
OK, so you've registered - can't disagree with that.
So far I'm only aware of 2 threads where you appear to "start something" - would I classify that as a "wide variety" no, but I see a pattern developing.
<font color=blue>b) don’t research the topic and but forth a reasonably well articulated argument.</font color=blue>
Look back at my earlier statement - I NEVER TOOK A POSITION as to the "accuracy" or "inaccuracy" of your "observations." (It's even possible that I might actually AGREE on some of them /w3tcompact/icons/shocked.gif) I've said multiple times on TBN that "every tractor has its +'s and -'s ", so, once again, my comments have NOTHING to do with your "observations" in and of themselves.
What I said is your presentation (on this thread and the "Kioti isn't worth the risk" thread) was the problem. If you really wanted to "educate" others and "draw out" real issues associated with Chinese tractors (or Kioti, or whatever other brand), you'd have taken a different tack -- one with far less "vinegar."
<font color=blue> Usually, they just make an inflaming remark and disappear into the distance to watch the fun.</font color=blue>
Hmmm... /w3tcompact/icons/hmm.gif YOU actually state <font color=red>"Well, I asked my original question some time ago and it didn’t get much of a response. I only checked back recently and was surprised to see all the comments."</font color=red> in the post "Kioti isn't worth the risk" - sounds to me that "disappear into the distance to watch the fun" is EXACTLY what you did there.
<font color=blue>But, to use your logic above, if “open discourse” means that I am “provoke[ing] others,” and “asking for a confrontation”…then so be it. </font color=blue>
At least you are admitting it now....