However, you do not seem prepared to afford the same liberty to those who don't see the issue as you do. You seem fully prepared to be so pretentious as to assume that you know something I simply don't grasp (I'd try to enlighten you, etc.) It's not your viewpoint on the climate that bothers me...though I disagree with it, I maintain that you have the right to it...it's the attitude that just screams that those who disagree with you just need enlightenment and don't understand.
And if *** YOU *** don't believe the dogma we will take your job, i.e, your lively hood, so we are stopping you from buying groceries, paying the mortgage/rent, etc.
If you think this is extreme, its not. People have protested that the director of the Miami Hurricane Center should be fired because he does not see any evidence that supports the idea the Global Warming has produced more hurricanes. Or more intense hurricanes. Therefore lets fire him and get someone who believes like us.
One of the Meterologists on the Weather Channel has stated that ANY Meterologist who does not believe in Human Caused Global Warming should have their certification revoked...
In other words, Believe Or Else.
If oil runs out. So what?
We will use tar sands. We will convert gas, which is abundant into diesel. We will convert coal to diesel. The processes are well understood. And at $25 per barrel they are economical. Once those fossil fuels run out there will be another energy source. Maybe by then solar will make money sense. Maybe the envormentalist will support Nukes to pay for Hydrogen or electric cars. Or will will have limitless energy from Fusion reactors.
Sorry, I have heard the Gloom and Doom for decades. I can remember when rivers, lakes, and oceans REALLY where polluted. Now people swim in the Hudson. Air quality is vastly improved compared to 30 years ago.
I read this weekend of the latest greatest study proving Human Caused Global Warming. Its being written in four parts. Its still in draft mode. Summaries are being sent to politicians right now before the paper is finished. Its based on science and peer reviewed.
Huh?
How can it be peered reviewed if its a draft?
How can it be peered reviewed if its being published in four parts.
And if it really is science why do politicians get summaries now before its published?
Or is it just more propaganda?
Later,
Dan