Dougster said:Don't tempt me man!I'm guessing that the Tank and the Red Beast could easily do it together!!!
![]()
Dougster
Dougster said:You really should get a backhoe. The Tank deserves a Bradco 511 backhoe. You've even got the flow to support it.![]()
Then you would beat me on weight easily!![]()
Dougsster
Not yet.tlbuser said:No luck finding a new tracked playmate for the red beast?
Well, good point. But Ed's only got 11 GPM to work with... so buying a 611 might mean buying a PTO pump as well. He's certainly got a heavy machine to work with, but I'm not even sure he needs a backhoe at this point other than for the purpose of out-weighing my machine!tlbuser said:No way, go for the Bradco 611. Same size, more power! More power is good![]()
Dougster said:Well, good point. But Ed's only got 11 GPM to work with... so buying a 611 might mean buying a PTO pump as well. He's certainly got a heavy machine to work with, but I'm not even sure he needs a backhoe at this point other than for the purpose of out-weighing my machine!![]()
Dougster
Everyone needs a backhoe!civesnedfield said:Heck I don't need no stinkin' backhoe.
Yeah... but you've still got no nifty hoe and I do!civesnedfield said:I just compared the 4110 to the 4530, take the back hoe out of the picture and I have 1700 + pounds on ya.
Error... Error... Error. You are not including the entire subframe assembly (including removable section), bucket or hydraulic thumb. The grand total is a bit over two grand.civesnedfield said:Wait news flash, been doing more research. 4110 --weight 3969 pounds, 509 back hoe--weight 1425 pounds, for a combined weight of 5494 pounds. I have excluded the FEL because I can't find a weight, so we will call the FEL's equal.:
I don't think so... not unless you cheat with added weights (which I can do too)!!!civesnedfield said:Looks like I still got a couple hundred pounds on ya Doug.![]()
:
Uhhhhh... no.civesnedfield said:Wanna have a tractor pull ?![]()
:
Interesting. I'll have more size/weight data on the rocks after Friday. Didn't have time to take pix or measurements today... and I'm picking up my new CAT digging bucket tomorrow in Rhode Island... so a day off.civesnedfield said:Doug talked to the excavation contractor at work today. Explained the rocks to him. He thinks a 310 should be able to move them.![]()
Dougster said:Everyone needs a backhoe!Dougster
Dougster said:[Yeah... but you've still got no nifty hoe and I do!Dougster
Dougster said:[Error... Error... Error. You are not including the entire subframe assembly (including removable section), bucket or hydraulic thumb. The grand total is a bit over two grand.Dougster
Dougster said:[I don't think so... not unless you cheat with added weights (which I can do too)!!!Dougster
Dougster said:[Uhhhhh... no.Dougster
Dougster said:[Interesting. I'll have more size/weight data on the rocks after Friday. Didn't have time to take pix or measurements today... and I'm picking up my new CAT digging bucket tomorrow in Rhode Island... so a day off.![]()
Dougster
I'll bet it's in that ballpark... i.e., ~250 pounds (+/-) heavier. Shall we therefore call it about even???civesnedfield said:Ok. With the sub frame I'll give ya the 2 grand, but that only puts you at 250 to the good. I'll bet Jeremy will tell me that the 245 FEL has at least that on the 112FEL![]()
And I have the option of hanging two 1-ton weights off each side...civesnedfield said:I have the option of adding the counterweight on in about 5 minutes, that will give me an additional 1300 pounds in a flash.![]()
Don't push me man...civesnedfield said:CHICKEN
Dougster said:I'll bet it's in that ballpark... i.e., ~250 pounds (+/-) heavier. Shall we therefore call it about even???Or shall we go find a scale!!!
![]()
And I have the option of hanging two 1-ton weights off each side...... BIG DEAL!!! That is what they call cheating.
![]()
Don't push me man......the Red Beast does not turn down serious challenges!!!
![]()
Dougster