5030
Epic Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2003
- Messages
- 24,671
- Location
- SE Michigan in the middle of nowhere
- Tractor
- Kubota M9000 HDCC3 M9000 HDC
SONY.... a ton of baloney.
VHS was able to get their tapes to longer length than Beta by many hours.If I recall, wasn't Betamax actually a superior product, but Sony tried to sit high on a mountain of licensing? Thus the market went to the Phillips(?) VHS format because it was cheaper. Cheaper to license, cheaper to purchase, and inevitably, cheaper picture quality.
I recall reading this a while back and finding it quite interesting, like a precursor to the Mac and PC war of the 90's.
You can say the same thing about EVs. Yet as long as the financial incentive is there somebody will pursue it. It was the same way with gas autos 110 years ago... the difference back then was that entrepreneurs were risking their own money, rather than yours and mine.It's not just government policy. Right now, the best ways to produce Hydrogen are from electricity and from fossil fuels. So until there is another process, electric and gas will always be more efficient. As I see it, the Hydrogen concept depends on some magic way to make cheap Hydrogen.
It's not magic...It's not just government policy. Right now, the best ways to produce Hydrogen are from electricity and from fossil fuels. So until there is another process, electric and gas will always be more efficient. As I see it, the Hydrogen concept depends on some magic way to make cheap Hydrogen.
It's not magic...
There are a few different types of hydrogen some types use different methods to filter the hydrogen from seawater...
There is probably as much or more R&D monies being spent on developing more efficient ways to separate hydrogen than there is monies being spent on developing longer range batteries...
Who's "we" and how are "those" reports any different than what is available to those that know where to look and in the forward looking statements in the industry's SEC filings??We periodically see reports on advances in hydrogen production, but they are often misinterpreted. There is no accessible source of uncombined hydrogen. Hydrogen is either bound to oxygen in water or to carbon and oxygen in hydrocarbons. If you use water, and burn the hydrogen in a combustion engine, the best you can hope for is recovering about 40% of the energy used to produce the hydrogen. Fuel cells are better, but if you use electricity for electrolysis to produce the hydrogen, the efficiency is always lower than the electric/battery cycle.
That’s methane, not pure hydrogen. But methane can also be used as a fuel. So eat more beans.if you run out of gas (hydrogen) you can always plant your butt on the fill port provided you have extra inside...lol
Yes, but once gas autos were established, there has been a long history of federal subsidies for automakers and the petroleum industry.You can say the same thing about EVs. Yet as long as the financial incentive is there somebody will pursue it. It was the same way with gas autos 110 years ago... the difference back then was that entrepreneurs were risking their own money, rather than yours and mine.
Some of us don't agree with those, either.Yes, but once gas autos were established, there has been a long history of federal subsidies for automakers and the petroleum industry.