I hear ya Junkman, but I really hope they understand I'm not challenging their authority or slamming them personally for doing their job. Rather, I simply defined the exact EPOD boundaries on their map at my expense - which they all agree represented only "approximate" boundaries. Hey, for all I know, they might even be grateful to know exactly where they are for future reference. At any rate, they will reassess in light of this new information, but I have a hard time believing they want to get into a pizzing contest over something so insignificant. What would that accomplish ultimately?
Maybe I have an overly optimistic view that most men are decent and fair but, after removing this EPOD impediment and admitting my sins, I'm hoping the board will simply see the uncontested side setback variance to be the appropriate solution in everyone's best interest. I feel l must give them the benefit of the doubt and let it go one more move on their part. If they dismiss the EPOD issue but deny the side setback variance for no good reason, I will be forced to go full bore offensive. Until then, my tail remains firmly between my legs and my fingers crossed.
Maybe I have an overly optimistic view that most men are decent and fair but, after removing this EPOD impediment and admitting my sins, I'm hoping the board will simply see the uncontested side setback variance to be the appropriate solution in everyone's best interest. I feel l must give them the benefit of the doubt and let it go one more move on their part. If they dismiss the EPOD issue but deny the side setback variance for no good reason, I will be forced to go full bore offensive. Until then, my tail remains firmly between my legs and my fingers crossed.