Chuck52
Veteran Member
Rob,
I think I agree with your argument; It's not the improved tools we use, it's the way we teach how to use the tools. However, I also think both you and I have an advantage over our younger colleagues. I, and I think you, had to learn how do our work without the goodies now available. In my own area, I am of the last generation that had to be able to program, or at least read other folks programs, to be sure the new fangled computers were doing what we thought they were doing. Earlier in this thread there were comments about how one has to take extraneous classes to get a four year degree. As I recall, I was able to substitute a class in FORTRAN for a class in a foreign language, probably because my degree was a BS rather that a BA.
In most fields, the programming is now in place, and you can pretty much trust that the formulas used are correct. I use packaged programs, though I do have the source codes for the important parts. It has been years since I had the need to read the code to be sure it was doing the calculation correctly. The students I teach my field to now use GUI's that take care even of the need to correctly modify input files for each calculation. While I, old man that I am, am constantly being taught Windows tricks I have managed not to learn over the years and get by without, very few of my students know what they are doing if they need to use a command prompt window. And its not just my area. Virtually all instruments these days are packaged black boxes controlled by Windows computers, and not amenable to tampering with by the user....which means that the user never really learns how they work. Our electronics guy knows far more about the non-electronic mechanisms of our instruments than any of the students because only he ever sees those parts.
So, yes, the students can do their actual work more easily and quickly. The instruments are easy to use and give them the answers they need to go to the next step in their research, but they are much more dependent on other people for their work. Before I retire I have to remember to show someone where the water chiller room is, because I'm not sure anyone else even knows that some of the instruments are water cooled.
Chuck
I think I agree with your argument; It's not the improved tools we use, it's the way we teach how to use the tools. However, I also think both you and I have an advantage over our younger colleagues. I, and I think you, had to learn how do our work without the goodies now available. In my own area, I am of the last generation that had to be able to program, or at least read other folks programs, to be sure the new fangled computers were doing what we thought they were doing. Earlier in this thread there were comments about how one has to take extraneous classes to get a four year degree. As I recall, I was able to substitute a class in FORTRAN for a class in a foreign language, probably because my degree was a BS rather that a BA.
In most fields, the programming is now in place, and you can pretty much trust that the formulas used are correct. I use packaged programs, though I do have the source codes for the important parts. It has been years since I had the need to read the code to be sure it was doing the calculation correctly. The students I teach my field to now use GUI's that take care even of the need to correctly modify input files for each calculation. While I, old man that I am, am constantly being taught Windows tricks I have managed not to learn over the years and get by without, very few of my students know what they are doing if they need to use a command prompt window. And its not just my area. Virtually all instruments these days are packaged black boxes controlled by Windows computers, and not amenable to tampering with by the user....which means that the user never really learns how they work. Our electronics guy knows far more about the non-electronic mechanisms of our instruments than any of the students because only he ever sees those parts.
So, yes, the students can do their actual work more easily and quickly. The instruments are easy to use and give them the answers they need to go to the next step in their research, but they are much more dependent on other people for their work. Before I retire I have to remember to show someone where the water chiller room is, because I'm not sure anyone else even knows that some of the instruments are water cooled.
Chuck