A good electrician can separate out heavy non essential loads to a separate panel that wont run on generator. Or they can install good load shedding devices (i like PSP Products) that can auto disconnect heavy loads and auto reconnect them when more power is available. Allows for a smaller generator.
Yep. But this house has 7 breaker panels, and many of those non-essential loads are scattered into those various panels. There's also precious little space remaining for mounting more hardware in the utility room where the mains enter, and where we have the mains panel and two of the larger subpanels.
But to your point, it may be easy to shed the entire pool, especially if the pump can be reconnected and run during off-peak times, as that's on its own sub-panel connected into one of the panels in the basement. And I guess the entire shop/barn could be treated the same, but it will be hell trying to keep it warm on only a mini split runnig off-peak (cold overnight hours), to the point where there'd have to be some pretty high cost to keeping it connected for me to even consider it a good option.
If it comes down to adding complexity via load shedding, versus just buying more generator and battery, I anticipate just buying more generator and battery to sit outside is going to be far easier.
@WinterDeere around here, in an emergency event, generator refills are behind every other customer, so I would check that there is no force majeur clause buried in the propane supply agreeement.
Interesting. I guess I could see that, if our outages happened in cold weather. We have had one or two extended outages due to ice storms, but more are due to hurricanes, big summer storms, or in one case... a tornado! All periods where demand for propane heating is minimal.
In general, the solution where I have lived is to install a tank big enough to handle 2x the worst outage anticipated. Unlike gasoline or diesel, propane remains a good fuel indefinitely.
I wouldn't be opposed to burying a second tank next to the one we already have in the back yard, or just digging out the first and replacing with something larger, if warranted.
What's the lifespan of a buried tank? If the one we have here is due to expire during our ownership of the house anyway, then just swapping it out now seems like a slam dunk.
This was the main table that I was referring to;
Okay... same page I used for my math, except I chose numbers off the RG Protector Series, since the largest Next Gen looked too small for a non-battery install here.
I am sorry, but I think am missing something with the consumption math above. In doing the 32kW example propane math that you posted with 2.7gal/hr, I get 24x2.7= 64.8gal/day or at a full 32kW load 110gal/day.
Average yearly usage is 2 - 4 MWh, with lows in April and October and highs in July and August, which should rub out to about 2.5 - 5.5 kW average loading, for the purpose of calculating daily fuel consumption. That puts average burn rate on a 32 kW RG Protector series around 1.12 - 1.45 gal/hr, just linearly extrapolating the two points they gave us, which indicates a fixed 0.8 gal/hr. for just running + P*.119 gal/kW. Simple y = mx + b, which should be close enough for this purpose.
So 1.12 - 1.45 gal/hr = 27 - 35 gal/day, as I figure it. It should actually be a bit lower, since my actual usage last year was only 1688 - 3697 kWh/mo, the "2 - 4 MW" I quoted above just being a quick estimate for the sake of round numbers.
And those Generac numbers are under ideal conditions, not too hot, not too cold. I would plan on slightly higher consumption.
Good point. My over-estimation / rounding may have already taken care of that, but I'll be sure we aren't shaving too close.
Finally, I am not pushing any particular manufacturer or battery system. Generac just happens to have some fairly detailed manuals and informational documentation on their website.
yep. I'm not married to Generac, in fact I'll be getting quotes for at least Kohler in addition to, and maybe one or two others.
I'm sure Generac has perfected the art of making everything as cheaply as humanly possible, but with a zillion units deployed in the field, they also have more data and experience on where cost is wasted versus valued. No need to build "Part A" heavier, when it's always "Part B" that fails first... and they probably have more FMA data than any other manufacturer.
It's interesting that the 22kw has the highest fuel consumption
They make a comment about that on their site, essentially stating that some of their models in a series are much newer or older than other models in the same series, and that fuel consumption tends to be better on the models released at later dates due to continuous design improvement. Probably half true and half BS, covering other factors we will never know.