Folks are quick to jump GM for being negligent when I suspect that much of the fault with fatalities is with the driver failing to react to a simple emergency situation or pushing the envelope with excessive speed being the real culprit.
Speaking of negligence in manufacturing, anyone see the documentary on the Remington 700 rifle that fires when unloading. One has to push the safety off in order to unload the gun and this sometimes cause the gun to fire without pulling the trigger. Remington has known about it since first months of manufacturing as the designer came up with a fix that would cost $.05 per unit to install. Remington said that it was too costly and continued to KNOWLINGLY manufacture them with the defective safety. Even after settling several lawsuits where deaths have occurred due to this, they continued to manufacture it up until a few year ago when they finally put in a new safety system. NOW THAT IS NEGLIGENCE TO THE NTH DEGREE. To this day, Remington refuses to acknowledge that there is a problem with the gun. Today after MILLIONS of these rifles have been made, it would bankrupt the company to make a recall on these guns and only refer to owners that they will put in a new trigger system for owners if they will ship their guns to the manufacturer and wait 6 months or more for them to fix them AND the owner has to pay for the repair.
Engineers don't always get it right with the specifications on every item which is why they sometimes have to recall some manufactured items. Not every recall is a life threatening situation either. In todays world, no one thinks of themselves as being responsible for anything and want to sue, sue, sue for their mistakes. No one can make an idiot proof machine, but todays society assumes that anything for sale should be safe for any idiot to use. Anyone recall the issue where a woman put her new RV on "cruise" and went back to make a sandwich which off course lead to a crash which then made manufacturers put a warning in the operators manual to explain how it doesn't drive itself. What kind of idiot thinks cruise controls makes a vehicle drive itself, but I am sure they sued the company (might even have got some money from it).
It is just sad to see that our society in the last few decades has become a nation of "not my fault" when any thing happens.
I've seen recent interviews with that original designer of the gun. He started making the recommendation for re-design many decades ago (like before I was born).
Good example of corporations being run by bean-counters.
Other than Engineering not being able to out-muscle Finance (a common problem), the malaise at GM seems to have been deeper than that - another quote from the LA Times article:
"The report highlights a company that operated in silos," Barra said, "with a number of individuals seemingly looking for reasons not to act, instead of finding ways to protect our customers."
I also wonder why it's taken till now for these highly paid GM execs (present and past) to figure out what is going on (or not) within the divisions they are responsible for ?
Many drivers on the roads today need to improve their skills, attitude, and attention to what they are doing. Ownership needs to improve there too, not just with GM. That said, no, I would not want to be facing an emergency situation in a modern vehicle with most/all of the electronics etc. disabled.
Rgds, D.