Re: Hydrostatic vs. Manual pro\'s and con\'s
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( <font color="blue">Pulling felled trees is one of the tasks I do.
</font> )</font>
In MY opinionYou will probably not have one bit of problem with a hydro pulling trees or anything else ( I have not).The heat build up is nothing I have noticed that would be a problem or anything that is abnormal. I have hauled rocks in my bucket that weigh about a 1000 pounds up 20% to 23% grades. I like the hydro for tilling and bush hogging as well. I like the infinite control of speed for the tilling and I like the hydro for brush hogging on the edges of these ridges where I need to back into my subject on the steep edges. IE: where I need to go forward and backward repeatedly to mow the edge of a ridge that is to steep to drive parallel with. I can see where a power reverser would work good for this type of mowing. I would not worry about the hydro failing,I think they will last and hold up well under abuse. To me it is about like comparing power steering to the older vehicles that did not have power steering,they both get the job done,some people might like the feel of manual( no power) steering over power steering. My Father did not like power steering,he thought he had a better feel of the road through the( lack of better term) none power steering. Then again Dad did not like air conditioning either. He was from the old school if you know what I mean . /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Best of luck in whatever you decide to go with !!!