With 85 PTO horsepower I can usually blow the driveway in 540 E
I wonder if Ill be able to do this with the 4707. I would guess for small snowfalls but any big dumps or drifts ill for sure have to use regular 540. 4707 PTO HP is roughly 60.
Once or twice I haven’t even had to use creeper gear.
I've been wondering if I should get them to add this. I hear its not terribly expensive, and I saw another youtube video where a guy basically says creeper is good for snowblowing. Part of me wants to try it without it though...
hydraulic shoot deflection but after one season I added it on
I live in the middle of nowhere so I feel like shoot deflection isn't that important I just blow it basically as far as I can. But if I did want this, don't I need the 3rd remote? I only have 2 rears currently.
This is why I suggested the plow. No going back and forth. Controlling the windrows to just one side of your desire and making long sweeping runs that take minutes.
I do currently have a plow truck. I'm torn between trying to sell it for what I have into it, and just holding onto it. I only have $6k invested and its double duty as one of my 4WD vehicles. If I do decide to hold onto it, I'm sure ill use it to plow 2 inch snowfalls that we might get. Or do I just leave 2 inch snowfalls and let it pile up some and snowblow it once the drift has come? I suppose with a big blower I don't really need to stay on top of clearing my drive. I can let it drift all night if I want and then blow it the next day?
Is there enough hydraulic flow on your tractor to operate a hydraulic driven blower instead of a PTO driven blower?
This was a question I kind of had when I first started looking into snowblowers (as I was considering a skid steer as well). From my understanding most tractors won't be able to supply the gpm to really give the snowblower enough power.
Using the 4707 as an example, the PTO is 60HP. If we were to use the full power of the hydraulics you would get (17.7 * 2800) / 1714 = 28.9 HP from the hydraulics. Apparently there is some efficiency lost with pumps with those systems, but I don't really know much about that. Basically, the blower you would be able to operate would be much smaller but using the tractor hydraulics alone. Quick attach makes a power unit that converts PTO into hydraulic power, it then hoses that to your loader mounted blower. I believe Deere does the same thing for their 4 series tractors. These are pretty expensive on top of the cost of the blower. I would say if you're that dead set on using a front blower just get the one that routes the PTO power under the tractor to the front.
This is where things get a little strange, at least for me. While researching all of this I kept seeing pictures of a 4707 with a mid/front PTO. But searching for that feature specifically was kind of a dead end on Massey's website. Digging a bit I found that a few companies mostly in Europe make a modification (I guess?) that gives a front 3 pt and PTO on many different tractors.
Front 3-point Hitch + Front PTO - Zuidberg North America
I asked them for a quote, I'm wondering if the 3 point arms are removable, or if they interfere with the loader when its attached. Either way I thought it was an interesting 3rd/4th/5th option that I should at least learn about. Does anyone know why this wouldn't be a more standard option on tractors on the US? It seems like its more common in Europe for whatever reason.