MrJimi said:
Bones, I need some help here,
your beam is 10 inches wide and 22 inches tall and 30 feet long, is that correct? what does it weigh total or per foot
Not quite, MrJimi. Check post #33. The designation W10X22 is for a Wide Flange Beam, 10" deep weighing 22 pounds per foot. Flange width is 5.75 inches.
Bones, I'll second tuolumne in advising that beam should be adequate, although I notice that your working load has changed from 1000# in post #1 to 2000# in Post #23. If the 2000# is the correct figure, I'll encourage you to consider the W12X26 (12" deep, 6 1/2" flange, 26#/foot), for the extra margin and stiffness both transverse and lateral. The W12 beam should have roughly the same deflection under 2000# as the W10 under 1000# loading. I also strongly encourage you to pay attention to tuolumne's recommendation for lateral bracing or blocking.
When the beam is loaded, the lower flange is in tension, the upper in compression. Think of that upper flange as being a long thin column in compression - not exactly the same situation, but similiar. A long thin member in compression is just looking for an excuse to buckle. I know, intuition says the vertical load on the lower flange will keep it from rolling sideways, but it won't. Stabilize it with lateral bracing or, sure as the world, it
will twist and buckle under load.
To get an intuitive feeling for what happens, think of picking up a long 1x12 and trying to hold it with the 12" dimension vertical. That sucker will twist and bow at the least provocation. To quote tuolumne from post #43, "Think 300 lb wet noodle

". The steel is much stiffer and doesn't exhibit the behaviour quite so drastically, but the principle is much the same.
Good luck!
