cowboydoc. . . I do my best to be very objective and not bash any brand, but as I do own several pieces of smaller JD equipment myself, I see that much of the technology is foreign, even if many of the parts come from the USA. As for the line of CUTs from JD, I believe I defended the fact that there is nothing wrong with foreign parts, but I think it is simplistic to say that "the engine in Yanmar" simply because the engine is the guts of the tractor and makes up the largest single cost item and the largest single contribution to the usefulness of the tractor. But pointing that out is not bashing. Nor was pointing out that the transmission is foreign as well as the engine (even if from a different part of the world).
I do think Kubotas and Kiotis seem to get bashed pretty hard on this site.
RE: JD 335 vs Kubota BX:
You said "There's nothing at all wrong with the 335 that wouldn't serve that guy for many, many years" regarding the guy who is comparing the JD lawn tractor to the Kubota BX, I've gone over the two different threads that he started that I am aware of and I don't see bashing,
I do see a lot of differences between the tractors he is looking at, and it is pretty clear that one machine is vastly superior to the other machine on so many different levels that it might look like bashing, but it is not. It is clear that the Kubota will do what he wants without straining his machine, it is not clear if the JD SX335 is capable of doing the same. And numerous people, including a guy who owns a JD 335 pointed out that the tractor might very well be lacking. I think that is very objective and far from bashing because the guy cited his own machine. I pointed out the shortcoming of one of my own machine as a similar illustration to why the JD 2wd lawn tractor might be lacking and also pointed to a 4wd unit that I own -without pushing that brand- but pointing out the major advantage of 4wd on hills. However, I think that some, including you, will try to advocate your brand choice even if it is not necessarily the best choice. That is reverse-bashing? Whatever it is, it does not really serve justice to the guy who posted the first inquiry. So going back to what you said, I think there is ample OBJECTIVE evidence to allow for a high degree of disagreement with what you wrote, but just because there is a lot of room to doubt your opinion, that in no way means it is bashing. It is simply just a difference of opinion.
Again, I am simply trying to be objective. I am in no way attacking. I have no problem with JD (although I have a problem with my local dealer which I hold the dealer responsible for). I simply think there is room for honest & objective disagreement within the bounds of civility.