plastikosmd
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2006
- Messages
- 1,101
7600 probably gets u most of the way to a backhoe ( if desired.)
Buy the Kubota. Higher price always indicates higher quality and value.Buy the LS. You can never go wrong buying something based on a paper spec and the lowest price.
Are you talking about implement connections or other stuff like hoses (belts etc).Lool into the whole issue of proprietary connections.
I've read that the LS has a lot of proprietary connection points. Dunno what they are. check it out.
I need to clarify my paper spec comment. I wasn't making a comment about LS in particular.Although I ended up purchasing an LS and have no regrets, one of the things I factored in was expected hours of operation. I have 220 hours after 3 years....and that is less than I had estimated (I had figured 100-120 hours /year). If I had expected to put on 400 hours a year, I may have been able to justify the Kubota. But it was over $8000 more, and the dealer was not very good.
Many hobby tractor owners have jobs that are not reoccurring. So think about that. In my case, even the reoccurring job has not materialized. For the last three years we have had far less snow than normal. In the last two years I have had to blow out my parking area and driveway only four times. Before getting the tractor, I had to plow 10-14 times a year.
I would ignore the comment about "paper specs". That suggests LS is deceptive about its performance specifications and I know my FEL will pick up a half cord of wood without any trouble (rated at 2700 lbs). That is good enough for me as a "test".
If you have a weak dealer, the LS may not be your best option. But New Holland has most, if not all, of their smaller tractors built by LS. That was another factor in my selection as I have a good NH dealer not far away as a back up. My NH dealer could not come close enough to the LS price so I went with LS.
The LS brand was only introduced in 2009 so not that many used ones out there. I believe they were labelled as "New Holland" before that. Kubota, OTOH, has been sold in the US under the same name for over 50 years.Not that this is bad, but I rarely see used LS tractors for sale
As I said I don't know. Once LS was no longer on my menu (because My dealer couldn't get any) I stopped paying attention and started looking at other tractors.Are you talking about implement connections or other stuff like hoses (belts etc).
Don't forget you're also getting 3 more gross HP, and 4 more at the PTO with the LS.
I don't know if that matters to you, but it looks like it comes down to a difference (after tax) of $7,600 and 4 Hp at the PTO.
$7,600 is a lot of money, and can buy some really nice implements. Or, will add some financial stability in uncertain times.
I went through basically the exact same decision 2.5 years ago. I was looking at the L3560 and LS XR4140HC (predecessor to the MT3). I have a great Kubota dealer, and they did their best in price, but like you, it was a $6-7k difference. I went with the LS, moved up to a 45 Hp, and haven't regretted the decision once.
3 to 4 hp difference - you will never know the difference except when reading the specs. Weight will tell you more than picking hp difference. A tractor with three less hp but weight of 800 or more pounds will pull the most.Don't forget you're also getting 3 more gross HP, and 4 more at the PTO with the LS.
I don't know if that matters to you, but it looks like it comes down to a difference (after tax) of $7,600 and 4 Hp at the PTO.
$7,600 is a lot of money, and can buy some really nice implements. Or, will add some financial stability in uncertain times.
I went through basically the exact same decision 2.5 years ago. I was looking at the L3560 and LS XR4140HC (predecessor to the MT3). I have a great Kubota dealer, and they did their best in price, but like you, it was a $6-7k difference. I went with the LS, moved up to a 45 Hp, and haven't regretted the decision once.