GManBart
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,967
- Location
- Detroit, Michigan
- Tractor
- Massey Ferguson 241, Kubota SVL90-2
These tractors are not SCUT tractors! They are CUT tractors that use standard 3 point attachments. I have a Kubota BX1800 this is a SCUT tractor! It needs sub-compact attachments to work well! I use the Kubota for grass cutting 95% of the time.
That is an opinion, not a fact. There are no universally recognized standards for what is and isn't a SCUT or CUT. This argument pops up time and again, and will never be settled.
The reality is your BX is one of the smallest SCUTs and has a base weight, of about 1,300lbs. The LS XJ2025H has a base weight of 1,605lbs (note that TractorData has incorrect weight numbers). The BX has a wheelbase of 55" and width of 45". The XJ has a wheelbase of 59" and a width of 45". In short, they're in the same ballpark of length, width and weight. Yes, the LS is a bit bigger and heavier, but it's not in a completely different class.
Even small CUTs frequently weigh at least 1,000lbs more than the machines you're talking about, and quite a few CUTs get well over 4,000lbs base weight. To suggest that a 1,600lb XJ2025H is in the same class as something like a 4,000lb L6060 (which isn't even the biggest/heaviest CUT around) is just silly.
In the end, it doesn't really matter....the OP is looking at this size machine, regardless of what class people think it fits in. For whatever reason, nearly every time this debate comes up, it's someone with one of the smaller CUTs taking offense to the slightly larger machines being put in the same class.