sqdqo
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 236
- Location
- Marquette Michigan
- Tractor
- Massey Ferguson 492 w/Quicke Q750 loader
Interesting point, I never thought about that. I'm at about 3200ft.:confused3: Is there much of a loss?The only question I would ask is at what elevation do you work at? You loose power as you go up, that is why I went with a turbo charged machine.
E/S
I don't see a need to go larger than the 5040 unless you want to pull implements larger than 6ft. The 5040 should pull a 6ft rotary cutter in all but the thickest brush with no problem.
I don't know the formula.Notforhire said:Interesting point, I never thought about that. I'm at about 3200ft.:confused3: Is there much of a loss?
Bill
I found it. Average is 5% per 1000 ft of elevation. So for me at 6000 ft is a lot.
E/S








foreman Etexas, I have one more question if I can ask, or anyone offer their opinion. Is there any significant difference in fuel usage between the M5040 and the M6040 or M7040? Also if someone describes their machine as having a synchro shuttle with no other description would you consider that to be a mechanical or hydro shuttle?